Extended Mind: A teacher's guide

What is The Extended Mind Thesis?

Andy Clark's extended mind thesis, originally published by Oxford University Press, in many ways was a hallmark paper. If you haven't watched one of his youtube interviews I thoroughly recommend you do so. His everyday examples of extended cognition capture the very essence of his philosophy. You'll hear many examples of how external resources are used to scaffold internal processes of the mind.

The extended cognition theory (Clark and Chalmers) states that we think not only with our brains, but with our bodies, the tools and technologies we use and the spaces in which we learn and work. Cognition is essentially shaped by action and experience. Our brain-centric culture, where intelligence is believed to be innate, individual, and internal, makes this theory particularly relevant for children. Children don't always conjure up new thoughts, action plays a central role in developing our cognitive processes.

Extended cognition is something we all embrace. Whether it be using our fingers to count with or writing down our ideas onto paper, we are extending the bounds of cognition by using an external resource. Cognitive processes are complicated and human intelligence has become increasingly entangled in technology. This cognitive integration is at the very centre of the extended mind hypothesis. Where exactly does the mind finish?

‍

‍

‍

We cannot command the brain at will to learn, to pay attention, or to remember. It is instead a very specific and limited organ, one that evolved to perform tasks very distinct from those we ask of it today. It is not a matter of individual differences in intelligence, but of the limits of everyone's brain.
 
The biological brain excels at a number of things: sensing and moving the body, manipulating material objects, navigating through space, and interacting with others. By leveraging these natural strengths we will be able to facilitate and improve learning.
 
The brain isn't naturally adept at grasping abstract or counterintuitive ideas, ignoring distracting stimuli, or remembering information accurately and without error for a long period of time. As part of these functions, the brain needs "outside the brain" help, like the body, physical space, and tools, like social interactions.
 
When you're learning or studying, you don't want to sit in one spot, not moving, not talking, just pushing your brain to work harder. Distress and disappointment result from such an approach.

‍

Practical ways of embracing extended minds in the classroom

 
1. Using our hands to extend our mind

‍
Gesturing is an integral part of a cognitive loop in which our hand motions influence our thoughts, and vice versa. The more gestures we make, the more fluent our thinking and speaking will be; the greater nuance and sophistication of our understanding. Have you ever watched someone give directions (without being able to hear them)? It's an impossible task to do without pointing or tracing your fingers. Here are some ways you can encourage the making of gestures:

• Research has shown that modeling leads to others following suit. Use your hands to explain your thinking; human cognition can be better understood when we add shape to our thoughts. 
• Studies show that people are more likely to gesture when there’s a relevant artifact nearby. We use the Writer's Block scaffolding tool to help students explain their cognitive processes. A lot of the time, they are simply not aware of their own thinking. This is perfect example of extending the bounds of cognition.
• Pupils must explain things impromptu in the classroom. When we improvise, we are mentally taxed, so we tend to gesture more to shift some of the cognitive burden to our hands.
• Try saying: “Use your hands to explain your thinking” or "add shape to your thoughts".

‍

 
2. Mentally offloading the stuff in our head

‍
In school, we do way too much “in our heads”; we would all be thinking more efficiently and effectively if we offloaded our cognitive processes more often. A quick look at the cognitive load theory would suggest that 'freeing up' our cognitive resources plays an active role in enabling us to learn more effectively. This is a skill that can be cultivated—here are some ways I try to do so:

• Talk about cognitive load, and how the brain can only handle so much information. Children are fascinated by all things brain-related. The brain should not be burdened with remembering or keeping track of things, so it can be used for higher-level cognitive activities like reflection and analysis.
• Use classroom strategies like graphic organisers and diagrams. This process encourages children to take their thoughts out of their head and into a shared space where they can work with them more effectively. The organisation of ideas is an act of human cognition.  

‍

 
3. Modelling our cognitive processes

‍
Experts who have difficulty teaching novices have "the curse of knowledge," which is when knowledge has become so automatic in their minds that they cannot explain it clearly to others. I am trying to keep in mind, as a teacher, that the curse of expertise applies to me. Chip and Dan Heath write about this topic in detail, once you are aware of the phenomenon, you'll immediately change your classroom practice.

• Mastering one small step at a time helps build learner confidence. Using the Universal Thinking Framework is a practical way of guiding human intelligence. The internal processes of learning all have names and understanding what they mean is a sure way of becoming better at studying.
• Think about a "cognitive apprenticeship." Traditionally, the expert would demonstrate the process to the novice. We must also make it possible to access the thinking processes as well as the physical actions we perform in our classrooms every day. Tell them what you're thinking when you edit your own work-for instance, explain to them just what your thinking.

‍

FAQ's about extended cognition 

1. What is the Extended Mind Theory?

The Extended Mind Theory, proposed by David Chalmers, suggests that human minds and mental processes are not confined within our brains but can extend into the environment. This cognitive extension implies that tools, objects, and even other people can become part of our minds. Research has explored this fascinating concept in depth.

2. How does the Extended Mind Hypothesis relate to social cognition?

The Extended Mind Hypothesis has significant implications for social cognition. It suggests that our understanding of others' minds can be influenced by our continuous interaction with them and our shared environment. This perspective can offer novel explanations of cognition in social contexts.

3. What does mental extension mean in the context of the Extended Mind Thesis?

Mental extension refers to the idea that our mental processes can extend beyond our brains into the external world. This could include using a notebook as an extension of our memory or a computer as an extension of our problem-solving abilities.

4. How does the Extended Mind Theory impact teaching and learning?

The Extended Mind Theory can transform our understanding of teaching and learning. It suggests that learning is not just an internal process but involves continuous interaction with others and the environment. This perspective can inform the development of teaching strategies that leverage these external resources.

5. What are the criticisms of the Extended Mind Theory?

While the Extended Mind Theory offers a unique perspective on cognition, it's not without criticism. Some argue that it overstates the role of external factors in cognition. Others question whether tools and objects can truly become part of our minds. Despite these debates, the Extended Mind Theory continues to stimulate thought-provoking discussions in cognitive science.

For a deeper dive into the Extended Mind Theory, you may refer to these research articles: Pressing the Flesh: A Tension in the Study of the Embodied, Embedded Mind?*, Extended emotion, From Wide Cognition to Mechanisms: A Silent Revolution, and The extended cognition thesis: Its significance for the philosophy of (cognitive) science.

‍

‍

‍

Further reading on the extended mind hypothesis

The extended mind hypothesis, as proposed by Andy Clark and David Chalmers, has significant implications for understanding cognition. Key studies defend the hypothesis against criticisms, explore the nature of cognitive coupling with the environment, and discuss the broader implications for cognitive science. These studies highlight the importance of considering external objects and environments as integral parts of cognitive processes.

1. Extended Mind as a Different Way to Realize Cognition

This paper responds to criticisms of the extended mind hypothesis by addressing the objections related to the distinctiveness of external cognitive states and the claim that the extended mind is not as groundbreaking as initially thought. It argues that the significance of the extended mind hypothesis lies in its rethinking of cognition and its relationship to the external environment (Meriç, 2022).

2. The Mark of the Cognitive and the Coupling-Constitution Fallacy: A Defense of the Extended Mind Hypothesis

This study defends the extended mind hypothesis against criticisms that it conflates coupling with constitution and lacks a clear mark of the cognitive. It argues that coupling relations between agents and environmental resources are central to understanding cognitive systems and that the criticisms fail to undermine the extended cognition thesis (Piredda, 2017).

3. What is the Extension of the Extended Mind?

This paper explores the details of functional coupling between organisms and external entities in the environment, drawing parallels with theories in biology such as environmental constructivism and niche construction. It argues that instances of environmental coupling are constitutive of cognitive functions and that natural environmental features play a crucial role in extended cognition (Greif, 2015).

4. Intrinsic Content, Active Memory and the Extended Mind

This work addresses the criticism that external structures cannot support intrinsic content, a key mark of cognitive processes. It argues that concerns about intrinsic content are unfounded and do not compromise the extended mind hypothesis. The paper also discusses the broader implications of extended mind theory for understanding cognition (Clark, 2005).

5. Extended Cognition and the Extended Mind: Introduction

This introduction to a special issue on extended cognition and the extended mind provides an overview of the extended mind thesis by Andy Clark and David Chalmers. It discusses various aspects of the extended mind hypothesis and its implications, arguing for a broader understanding of cognitive processes that includes external structures and environments (Bartlett, 2016).

‍

‍