Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination
Major motivation theories compared: Maslow, Herzberg, Deci and Ryan, and Dweck. How each explains what drives learners, and how teachers can apply them.


Major motivation theories compared: Maslow, Herzberg, Deci and Ryan, and Dweck. How each explains what drives learners, and how teachers can apply them.
Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination is a guide to the psychological frameworks that explain learner effort in school. It shows why learners start tasks, avoid them, keep going, or give up. These theories connect needs, goals, expectations, rewards and belonging, from Maslow's account of human motivation (Maslow, 1943) to Self-Determination Theory's focus on autonomy, competence and relatedness.
This connects to the wider context of fundamental theories of learning in modern classroom practice.
A concise Structural Learning audio episode on Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination, grounded in the curated research dossier and focused on practical classroom use.
Motivation theories are psychological frameworks that explain why learners try, keep going, or stop. They look at internal needs, external incentives, beliefs, goals and social conditions that shape motivation, persistence and goal-directed behaviour in learning.
For teachers, the issue is practical. A Year 8 learner who refuses writing may need clearer success criteria, a safer relationship with error, or a reason to value the task. Recent SDT evidence from 36 education studies involving 11,792 participants found benefits for autonomy, competence and intrinsic motivation (Wang et al., 2024). Even so, the strongest practice combines choice with firm classroom structure.
Motivation theories explain why learners begin, keep up, or avoid school work. They include need-based accounts such as Maslow (1943), cognitive models such as expectancy-value theory, social accounts such as Vygotsky (1978), retrieval-based evidence from Karpicke (2008), and Self-Determination Theory. This theory links autonomy, competence and relatedness to intrinsic motivation. Teachers use these motivational theories to decide whether a learner needs a safer routine, a clearer route to success, a stronger reason to care, or more structured choice.
| Theory | Key Theorist | Core Principle | Classroom Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Determination | Deci & Ryan | Autonomy, competence, relatedness | Offer choices, optimal challenge |
| Achievement Goal | Dweck (2006), Ames | Mastery vs performance goals | Focus on learning, not grades |
| Expectancy-Value | Eccles, Wigfield | Expectation × value = motivation | Build confidence and relevance |
| Attribution | Weiner | Causal beliefs affect motivation | Attribute success to effort |
| Flow | Csikszentmihalyi | Optimal challenge-skill balance | Match difficulty to ability |

For a quick answer to "What are the five theories of motivation?", teachers can group the field into needs theories, drive theory, expectancy-value theory, achievement motivation theory and Self-Determination Theory. Workplace motivation theory adds Herzberg's hygiene factors. These include salary, job security and working conditions, which prevent dissatisfaction, while motivators such as responsibility and personal growth support job satisfaction. Those hygiene factors help explain employee motivation and why pay alone may not motivate employees, but classroom practice has a different aim: to help learners see value in effort and feel able to act.
Deci and Ryan (1985) showed motivation impacts behaviour. Theories explain why learners select certain goals. These theories also explain learners' reactions to setbacks. Dweck (2006) explored sustained effort in learners.

Bandura (1977) found that reflection improves how learners think. Learners also feel motivation, and they can take active control of it.
Ryan and Deci (2000) showed motivation affects learner actions. Learners may cheat or skip work when they lack motivation. Teachers can use motivational theories to boost learning (Wigfield & Eccles, 2002).
Maslow (1943) said learners need basic needs met before learning. Hungry or unsafe learners prioritise survival, hindering lesson focus. Teachers can help by making classrooms safe. They can also support learner needs via breakfast clubs and routines.
Maslow's (1943) hierarchy of needs explains one part of learner motivation: unmet basic needs can crowd out attention, working memory and trust. It is not a full motivation theory for every classroom problem. A hungry learner may still want belonging, recognition and personal growth, so teachers should avoid treating the hierarchy needs model as a rigid checklist.
The familiar Maslow hierarchy pyramid needs caution. Maslow (1943) described relative priority among needs, but Bridgman, Cummings and Ballard (2019) argue that he did not create the classroom pyramid now found in many posters. The Maslow hierarchy needs model is better read as a prompt for noticing barriers, not as proof that learning must wait until every lower need is fully met.
In practice, needs operate in parallel. Safety, belonging, esteem and curiosity can all influence human motivation in the same lesson. A Year 6 learner coping with unstable housing may still work hard for a trusted teacher, especially when the task offers social connection, visible progress and a clear route to success.

Download a one-page study note for Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, with the key ideas, limitations and classroom links in one place.
Deci and Ryan (1985) showed that motivation drives what learners do. Self-Determination Theory considers both positive and negative behaviours. In class, motivation shapes learner behaviour.
Maslow (1943) showed learners need basic needs met first. Learning is reduced if physiological and safety needs are not fulfilled. This hierarchy helps teachers understand learner motivation.
Maslow (1943) showed motivation is complex; teachers should think about it. Meeting learner needs and encouragement are useful. Deci and Ryan's (1985) research offers more support.

Drive Theory (Hull, 1943) says learners are motivated by inner tension. This tension feels uncomfortable until a need is met. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
In class, this can mean curiosity gaps or missing knowledge. Teachers can use challenging questions to help learners solve problems (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
Hull's Drive Theory (1940s) says motivation comes from biological drives. Learners try to lessen internal tension or imbalance, Hull stated (1940s). This theory explains why learners behave as they do.
Learners act to lessen drives like hunger or curiosity. Hull (1943) called this the "drive-reduction cycle." Tension inspires action to restore balance (Hull, 1943; Spence, 1956).
Drive Theory appears in classrooms when learners face interesting problems. They show cognitive drives, which are mental pushes to find an answer (Hull, 1943).
This creates mental tension. Learners then seek answers, ask questions, and keep working until they resolve the task.
Loewenstein (1994) noted puzzling questions create learner interest. Berlyne (1960) showed contradictory facts grab learner focus. Bjork & Bjork (2011) suggest hard tasks improve learner learning. These struggles improve learner results overall.
Theories of Motivation in practice, a classroom-ready briefing you can use this week.
Deci and Ryan (1985) argued that learners need autonomy, competence and relatedness. But autonomy support does not mean letting learners do anything they want. Wang et al. (2024) found that SDT-based education interventions can support psychological needs and intrinsic motivation, especially when choice is paired with clear expectations, scaffolding and feedback. In a lesson, that might mean learners choose which evidence to use while the teacher keeps the success criteria fixed.
Deci and Ryan (1985) explain how self-determination shapes learner motivation. Their theory sets out different kinds of motivation. Deci and Ryan (2000) state that learners need certain things before they feel motivated.
Deci and Ryan (1985) said learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Meeting these needs helps build learners' intrinsic motivation. Learners then do activities for the fun of it (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
Self-Determination Theory has a strong effect on learning design. Research by Deci and Ryan (2000) shows that learners engage more in supportive settings. Learners also get better results and feel happier (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
Ryan and Deci (2020) say autonomy support means giving learners choices. Give clear feedback and manageable challenges to support competence. Learners feel valued when you create inclusive classrooms (Ryan & Deci, 2020).
Expectancy Theory explains learner motivation through three parts. Vroom (1964) said learners must expect that they can succeed. They must also believe that success brings rewards. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
Porter & Lawler (1968) added that learners must value these rewards. Learners work hard when they think goals are achievable. The theory helps teachers address learner disengagement.
Vroom's Expectancy Theory (Vroom) links learner motivation to three things: what learners expect, how useful it seems, and how much they value it. Learners weigh up these parts and then choose how much effort to use.
According to Vroom (1964), expectancy is when a learner thinks effort yields success. This means learners believe they can master material (Bandura, 1977). Learners with low expectancy might show learned helplessness (Seligman, 1975).

Download a one-page study note for Intrinsic Motivation, with the key ideas, limitations and classroom links in one place.
Research shows learners need to see effort leads to results (Vroom, 1964). Learners connect work with rewards, such as grades or future chances (Bandura, 1977). Seeing this link boosts learner motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985).
According to Wigfield and Eccles (2000), learners must value results. Learners need to believe effort leads to success, as per expectancy-value theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000). If learners don't value the outcome, motivation decreases (Eccles et al., 1983).
Expectancy Theory helps you pinpoint learner motivation issues. Learners may lack confidence (Vroom, 1964). They might not see the work's point (Porter & Lawler, 1968). Learners may also undervalue the goals (Lawler, 1973).
Learners are more motivated when they want success than when they fear failure. Atkinson (1957) showed that success-focused learners choose hard tasks and work harder. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
McClelland (1961) found that learners who fear failure avoid risks and give up. Dweck (2006) recommends valuing effort and offering good challenges to build learner motivation. For related guidance, see our article on Expectancy Theory.
McClelland and Atkinson's Achievement Motivation Theory explains learner success. It helps teachers understand the achievement choices learners make each day. UK schools find this theory very useful.
Atkinson (1964) and McClelland (1961) found learners have achievement, affiliation, and power motives. These needs drive learner behaviour, research shows. Schools often focus on achievement, as it links to learning.
Learners seeking achievement prefer moderately difficult tasks (Atkinson, 1964). These tasks offer challenge, yet learners find them manageable. Learners see feedback as a way to improve (Butler & Winne, 1995). They usually link their success to hard work (Weiner, 1985).

Download a one-page study note for Humanistic Psychology, with the key ideas, limitations and classroom links in one place.
Covington and Beery (1976) found fear makes learners pick easy tasks. Atkinson (1964) and Heckhausen (1991) saw learners choose impossible tasks. Learners blame the task to protect their self-image. This avoidance hinders academic progress for the learner.
These environments help learners feel more competent. Research from Dweck (2006) and Yeager & Dweck (2012) supports this.
Teachers can create these environments by setting tasks with suitable challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Learners should also set goals and assess their progress (Locke & Latham, 2002).
Research on motivation shows that learners differ (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Teachers should know that learners have diverse needs (Dweck, 2006). Classrooms need multiple motivational approaches (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002).
Maslow (1943) said teachers must first meet learners' basic needs. Routines and safe spaces can help, along with well-being awareness.
Deci & Ryan's (1985) theory says teachers should give learners choices. They should also offer appropriate challenges and build relationships.
Teachers can use Drive Theory with questions to create useful thinking. Expectancy Theory says help learners feel confident (Vroom, 1964). They need clear success routes and learning linked to what matters to them (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).
Researchers such as Covington (2000) suggest teachers build safe spaces. These spaces let learners take risks. Dweck (2006) says praise effort, not just success. Yorke and Knight (2004) see failure as a key part of learner progress.
Research by Deci and Ryan (1985) shows learners need motivation. Teachers can use diverse methods to engage learners in lessons. Understanding theories, like that of Dweck (2006), helps teachers. This makes learning more meaningful for every learner.
Deci and Ryan state that learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. In simple terms, they need choice, a sense of skill, and a sense of belonging. Meeting these needs should boost motivation (Deci & Ryan).
When motivation rises, learner engagement and outcomes improve. The framework focuses on internal drive, not rewards.
Maslow (1943) suggests meeting learners' basic needs first. Offer breakfast clubs and routines. Make the classroom safe physically and emotionally. Learners will focus on learning and friendship (Maslow, 1943).
Mastery goals help learners truly understand subjects. This focus helps learners persevere through tough tasks (Dweck, 1986). Mistakes then become chances to learn, building resilience (Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
Incentive Theory shows rewards boost short-term work, not lasting interest. Research shows prizes may hurt a learner's task enjoyment (Lepper et al., 1973). Focus on competence and choice. Use rewards with care (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Lepper et al., 1973).
Using one strategy for every learner is a common mistake. High pressure goals can cause anxiety in learners lacking confidence (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Relying too much on prizes may create compliance, not real skill practice (Lepper et al., 1973).
Flow Theory says matching challenge to skills improves learner focus and reduces stress. Overwhelming tasks stress learners (researchers). Teachers can engage learners with a 'sweet spot' challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). This builds learner confidence.
Download this free Motivation, Growth Mindset & Learner Agency resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
Free for teachers. The platform builds a classroom-ready lesson plan from your topic in under two minutes.
Motivation theories are useful, but several claims need care. First, Maslow's hierarchy needs is often shown as a fixed pyramid, although Maslow (1943) did not draw that classroom graphic. Wahba and Bridwell (1976) found weak evidence for a strict sequence of needs, and Bridgman, Cummings and Ballard (2019) traced the familiar pyramid to later management writing. This matters because a learner can still seek belonging, status or personal growth while hunger, safety or housing remain unsettled.
Second, many motivational theories come from Western, educated groups. Hofstede (1984) argued that models based on individual choice may fit individualist cultures better than collectivist communities. Teachers should keep this limit in mind.
The same caution applies to Vygotsky (1978). Social mediation, where others support learning, is powerful. Yet the form of help, talk and authority differs across classrooms and cultures.
Third, classroom interventions can be weaker than the theory suggests. Growth mindset work linked to Dweck (2006) shows small average effects in meta-analysis, and large-scale trials have not consistently raised attainment (Sisk et al., 2018; EEF, 2019). Retrieval research linked to Karpicke (2008) is strong, but early studies often used controlled tasks, short timescales and older learners, so teachers still need subject-specific checks.
Finally, Self-Determination Theory can be misread as just giving learners more choice. Wang et al. (2024) found positive effects from SDT-based interventions. Even so, autonomy support still needs clear routines, feedback and structure.
Despite these limits, the field remains useful for teachers. It helps them test why effort, persistence and belonging vary across real lessons.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success.
Karpicke, J. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Student motivation research
Motivation and learning
Theory grounded. Classroom workable. Free for teachers.
Open a free account and help organise learners' thinking with evidence-based graphic organisers. Reduce cognitive load and guide schema building dynamically.