Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination
Major motivation theories compared: Maslow, Herzberg, Deci and Ryan, and Dweck. How each theory explains what drives pupils to learn and how teachers can apply them.


Major motivation theories compared: Maslow, Herzberg, Deci and Ryan, and Dweck. How each theory explains what drives pupils to learn and how teachers can apply them.
Maslow (various dates) stated needs motivate learners. Self-Determination Theory and Incentive Theory explain learner motivation too. Drive Theory, Expectancy Theory, and Achievement Motivation Theory offer further insight. Teachers use these theories to plan lessons and support learners effectively.
| Theory | Key Theorist | Core Principle | Classroom Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Determination | Deci & Ryan | Autonomy, competence, relatedness | Offer choices, optimal challenge |
| Achievement Goal | Dweck, Ames | Mastery vs performance goals | Focus on learning, not grades |
| Expectancy-Value | Eccles, Wigfield | Expectation × value = motivation | Build confidence and relevance |
| Attribution | Weiner | Causal beliefs affect motivation | Attribute success to effort |
| Flow | Csikszentmihalyi | Optimal challenge-skill balance | Match difficulty to ability |

Understanding learner motivation helps teachers. Ryan and Deci (2000) show different views from motivation theories. We look at these theories, noting what is alike and different. Willingham (2009) gives useful teaching advice.
Deci and Ryan (1985) showed motivation impacts behaviour. Theories explain why learners select certain goals. These theories also explain learners' reactions to setbacks. Dweck (2006) explored sustained effort in learners.

Deci and Ryan (1985) found rewards motivate learners in their Incentive Theory. Researchers show learners participate more when you promise rewards for tasks.
Bandura (n.d.) found reflection improves learner thinking. Learners feel motivation, which they can actively control.
Ryan and Deci (2000) showed motivation affects learner actions. Learners may cheat or skip work when they lack motivation. Teachers can use motivational theories to boost learning (Wigfield & Eccles, 2002).
Maslow (1943) said learners need basic needs met before learning. Hungry or unsafe learners prioritise survival, hindering lesson focus. Teachers can help by making classrooms safe. They can also support learner needs via breakfast clubs and routines.
Maslow's (1943) Hierarchy of Needs explains learner motivation. This theory expands on previous concepts. It gives teachers a way to understand diverse learner needs. Maslow (1943) created an early cognitive theory.
Maslow (mid-20th century) theorised needs form a pyramid. Basic needs like food are at the bottom. Self-actualisation, or reaching potential, sits at the top. Learners address lower needs before higher ones.
Maslow's theory (1943) says unmet needs shape behaviour. Learners focus on basic needs first if those needs remain unfulfilled. This focus then outweighs other things that might motivate them, as stated by Maslow.
Deci and Ryan (1985) showed motivation drives learner actions. Self-Determination Theory considers both positive and negative behaviours. Motivation shapes learner behaviour in class.
Maslow (1943) showed learners need basic needs met first. Learning is reduced if physiological and safety needs are not fulfilled. This hierarchy helps teachers understand learner motivation.
Maslow (1943) showed motivation is complex; teachers should think about it. Meeting learner needs and encouragement are useful. Deci and Ryan's (1985) research offers more support.

Drive Theory (Hull, 1943) says internal tensions motivate learners. These tensions create discomfort until satisfied. Learners are motivated by curiosity gaps or knowledge deficits. Teachers can use this by posing challenging questions. This encourages learners to solve problems (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
Hull's Drive Theory (1940s) says motivation comes from biological drives. Learners try to lessen internal tension or imbalance, Hull stated (1940s). This theory explains why learners behave as they do.
Learners act to lessen drives like hunger or curiosity. Hull (1943) called this the "drive-reduction cycle." Tension inspires action to restore balance (Hull, 1943; Spence, 1956).
Drive Theory appears in classrooms. Learners show cognitive drives when facing interesting problems. This creates mental tension, (Hull, 1943). Learners seek answers, ask questions, and keep working. They reduce tension by resolving tasks.
Loewenstein (1994) noted puzzling questions create learner interest. Berlyne (1960) showed contradictory facts grab learner focus. Bjork & Bjork (2011) suggest hard tasks improve learner learning. These struggles improve learner results overall.
Deci and Ryan (various dates) said learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Motivation rises when learners pick tasks, do well, and feel connected. Learner-centred teaching motivates learners better than teacher-led methods.
Deci and Ryan (1985) show how self-determination affects motivation in learners. The theory explains different kinds of motivation. Deci and Ryan (2000) state learners need specific things to feel motivated.
Deci and Ryan (1985) said learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Meeting these needs helps build learners' intrinsic motivation. Learners then do activities for the fun of it (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
Self-Determination Theory greatly affects learning design. Research by Deci and Ryan (2000) shows learners engage more with supportive settings. Learners also get better results and feel happier (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
Ryan and Deci (2020) say autonomy support means giving learners choices. Give clear feedback and manageable challenges to support competence. Learners feel valued when you create inclusive classrooms (Ryan & Deci, 2020).
Expectancy Theory describes learner motivation using three parts. Vroom (1964) said learners must expect they can succeed. They must also believe success brings rewards. Porter & Lawler (1968) added that learners must value these rewards. Learners work hard when they think goals are achievable. The theory helps teachers address learner disengagement.
Vroom's Expectancy Theory (Vroom) connects learner motivation to what they expect, its usefulness, and value. Learners carefully consider these elements and choose how much effort to apply.
According to Vroom (1964), expectancy is when a learner thinks effort yields success. This means learners believe they can master material (Bandura, 1977). Learners with low expectancy might show learned helplessness (Seligman, 1975).
Research shows learners need to see effort leads to results (Vroom, 1964). Learners connect work with rewards, such as grades or future chances (Bandura, 1977). Seeing this link boosts learner motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985).
According to Wigfield and Eccles (2000), learners must value results. Learners need to believe effort leads to success, as per expectancy-value theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000). If learners don't value the outcome, motivation decreases (Eccles et al., 1983).
Expectancy Theory helps you pinpoint learner motivation issues. Learners may lack confidence (Vroom, 1964). They might not see the work's point (Porter & Lawler, 1968). Learners may also undervalue the goals (Lawler, 1973).
Learners want success more than fearing failure, driving their motivation. Atkinson (1957) showed success-focused learners choose hard tasks and work harder. McClelland (1961) found failure-fearing learners avoid risks and quit. Dweck (2006) recommends valuing effort and offering good challenges to build learner motivation.
McClelland and Atkinson's Achievement Motivation Theory explains learner success. The theory helps us understand learners' daily achievement choices (dates not provided). UK schools find this theory very useful.
Atkinson (1964) and McClelland (1961) found learners have achievement, affiliation, and power motives. These needs drive learner behaviour, research shows. Schools often focus on achievement, as it links to learning.
Learners seeking achievement prefer moderately difficult tasks (Atkinson, 1964). These tasks offer challenge, yet learners find them manageable. Learners see feedback as a way to improve (Butler & Winne, 1995). They usually link their success to hard work (Weiner, 1985).
Covington and Beery (1976) found fear makes learners pick easy tasks. Atkinson (1964) and Heckhausen (1991) saw learners choose impossible tasks. Learners blame the task to protect their self-image. This avoidance hinders academic progress for the learner.
These environments increase a learner's feeling of competence. Research from Dweck (2006) and Yeager & Dweck (2012) supports this. Teachers can create these environments. They should present tasks with suitable challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Learners should set goals and assess their progress (Locke & Latham, 2002).
Research on motivation shows that learners differ (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Teachers should know that learners have diverse needs (Dweck, 2006). Classrooms need multiple motivational approaches (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002).
Maslow (1943) said teachers must meet basic learner needs initially. Routines and safe spaces can help. Encourage well-being awareness. Deci & Ryan's (1985) theory says give learners choices. Offer appropriate challenges and build relationships.
Teachers can use Drive Theory with questions to create useful thinking. Expectancy Theory says help learners feel confident (Vroom, 1964). They need clear success routes and learning linked to what matters to them (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).
Researchers such as Covington (2000) suggest teachers build safe spaces. These spaces let learners take risks. Dweck (2006) says praise effort, not just success. Yorke and Knight (2004) see failure as a key part of learner progress.
Research by Deci and Ryan (1985) shows learners need motivation. Teachers can use diverse methods to engage learners in lessons. Understanding theories, like that of Dweck (2006), helps teachers. This makes learning more meaningful for every learner.
Deci and Ryan state learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Meeting these needs should boost motivation (Deci & Ryan). Increased motivation improves learner engagement and outcomes. The framework focuses on internal drive, not rewards.
Maslow (1943) suggests meeting learners' basic needs first. Offer breakfast clubs and routines. Make the classroom safe physically and emotionally. Learners will focus on learning and friendship (Maslow, 1943).
Mastery goals help learners truly understand subjects. This focus helps learners persevere through tough tasks (Dweck, 1986). Mistakes then become chances to learn, building resilience (Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
Incentive Theory shows rewards boost short-term work, not lasting interest. Research shows prizes may hurt a learner's task enjoyment (Journal of Educational Psychology). Focus on competence and choice. Use rewards with care (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Lepper et al., 1973).
Using one strategy for every learner is a common mistake. High pressure goals can cause anxiety in learners lacking confidence (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Relying too much on prizes may create compliance, not real skill practice (Lepper et al., 1973).
Flow Theory says matching challenge to skills improves learner focus and reduces stress. Overwhelming tasks stress learners (researchers). Teachers can engage learners with a 'sweet spot' challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). This builds learner confidence.
Download this free Motivation, Growth Mindset & Student Agency resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.
Student motivation research
Motivation and learning
Maslow (various dates) stated needs motivate learners. Self-Determination Theory and Incentive Theory explain learner motivation too. Drive Theory, Expectancy Theory, and Achievement Motivation Theory offer further insight. Teachers use these theories to plan lessons and support learners effectively.
| Theory | Key Theorist | Core Principle | Classroom Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Determination | Deci & Ryan | Autonomy, competence, relatedness | Offer choices, optimal challenge |
| Achievement Goal | Dweck, Ames | Mastery vs performance goals | Focus on learning, not grades |
| Expectancy-Value | Eccles, Wigfield | Expectation × value = motivation | Build confidence and relevance |
| Attribution | Weiner | Causal beliefs affect motivation | Attribute success to effort |
| Flow | Csikszentmihalyi | Optimal challenge-skill balance | Match difficulty to ability |

Understanding learner motivation helps teachers. Ryan and Deci (2000) show different views from motivation theories. We look at these theories, noting what is alike and different. Willingham (2009) gives useful teaching advice.
Deci and Ryan (1985) showed motivation impacts behaviour. Theories explain why learners select certain goals. These theories also explain learners' reactions to setbacks. Dweck (2006) explored sustained effort in learners.

Deci and Ryan (1985) found rewards motivate learners in their Incentive Theory. Researchers show learners participate more when you promise rewards for tasks.
Bandura (n.d.) found reflection improves learner thinking. Learners feel motivation, which they can actively control.
Ryan and Deci (2000) showed motivation affects learner actions. Learners may cheat or skip work when they lack motivation. Teachers can use motivational theories to boost learning (Wigfield & Eccles, 2002).
Maslow (1943) said learners need basic needs met before learning. Hungry or unsafe learners prioritise survival, hindering lesson focus. Teachers can help by making classrooms safe. They can also support learner needs via breakfast clubs and routines.
Maslow's (1943) Hierarchy of Needs explains learner motivation. This theory expands on previous concepts. It gives teachers a way to understand diverse learner needs. Maslow (1943) created an early cognitive theory.
Maslow (mid-20th century) theorised needs form a pyramid. Basic needs like food are at the bottom. Self-actualisation, or reaching potential, sits at the top. Learners address lower needs before higher ones.
Maslow's theory (1943) says unmet needs shape behaviour. Learners focus on basic needs first if those needs remain unfulfilled. This focus then outweighs other things that might motivate them, as stated by Maslow.
Deci and Ryan (1985) showed motivation drives learner actions. Self-Determination Theory considers both positive and negative behaviours. Motivation shapes learner behaviour in class.
Maslow (1943) showed learners need basic needs met first. Learning is reduced if physiological and safety needs are not fulfilled. This hierarchy helps teachers understand learner motivation.
Maslow (1943) showed motivation is complex; teachers should think about it. Meeting learner needs and encouragement are useful. Deci and Ryan's (1985) research offers more support.

Drive Theory (Hull, 1943) says internal tensions motivate learners. These tensions create discomfort until satisfied. Learners are motivated by curiosity gaps or knowledge deficits. Teachers can use this by posing challenging questions. This encourages learners to solve problems (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
Hull's Drive Theory (1940s) says motivation comes from biological drives. Learners try to lessen internal tension or imbalance, Hull stated (1940s). This theory explains why learners behave as they do.
Learners act to lessen drives like hunger or curiosity. Hull (1943) called this the "drive-reduction cycle." Tension inspires action to restore balance (Hull, 1943; Spence, 1956).
Drive Theory appears in classrooms. Learners show cognitive drives when facing interesting problems. This creates mental tension, (Hull, 1943). Learners seek answers, ask questions, and keep working. They reduce tension by resolving tasks.
Loewenstein (1994) noted puzzling questions create learner interest. Berlyne (1960) showed contradictory facts grab learner focus. Bjork & Bjork (2011) suggest hard tasks improve learner learning. These struggles improve learner results overall.
Deci and Ryan (various dates) said learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Motivation rises when learners pick tasks, do well, and feel connected. Learner-centred teaching motivates learners better than teacher-led methods.
Deci and Ryan (1985) show how self-determination affects motivation in learners. The theory explains different kinds of motivation. Deci and Ryan (2000) state learners need specific things to feel motivated.
Deci and Ryan (1985) said learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Meeting these needs helps build learners' intrinsic motivation. Learners then do activities for the fun of it (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
Self-Determination Theory greatly affects learning design. Research by Deci and Ryan (2000) shows learners engage more with supportive settings. Learners also get better results and feel happier (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
Ryan and Deci (2020) say autonomy support means giving learners choices. Give clear feedback and manageable challenges to support competence. Learners feel valued when you create inclusive classrooms (Ryan & Deci, 2020).
Expectancy Theory describes learner motivation using three parts. Vroom (1964) said learners must expect they can succeed. They must also believe success brings rewards. Porter & Lawler (1968) added that learners must value these rewards. Learners work hard when they think goals are achievable. The theory helps teachers address learner disengagement.
Vroom's Expectancy Theory (Vroom) connects learner motivation to what they expect, its usefulness, and value. Learners carefully consider these elements and choose how much effort to apply.
According to Vroom (1964), expectancy is when a learner thinks effort yields success. This means learners believe they can master material (Bandura, 1977). Learners with low expectancy might show learned helplessness (Seligman, 1975).
Research shows learners need to see effort leads to results (Vroom, 1964). Learners connect work with rewards, such as grades or future chances (Bandura, 1977). Seeing this link boosts learner motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985).
According to Wigfield and Eccles (2000), learners must value results. Learners need to believe effort leads to success, as per expectancy-value theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000). If learners don't value the outcome, motivation decreases (Eccles et al., 1983).
Expectancy Theory helps you pinpoint learner motivation issues. Learners may lack confidence (Vroom, 1964). They might not see the work's point (Porter & Lawler, 1968). Learners may also undervalue the goals (Lawler, 1973).
Learners want success more than fearing failure, driving their motivation. Atkinson (1957) showed success-focused learners choose hard tasks and work harder. McClelland (1961) found failure-fearing learners avoid risks and quit. Dweck (2006) recommends valuing effort and offering good challenges to build learner motivation.
McClelland and Atkinson's Achievement Motivation Theory explains learner success. The theory helps us understand learners' daily achievement choices (dates not provided). UK schools find this theory very useful.
Atkinson (1964) and McClelland (1961) found learners have achievement, affiliation, and power motives. These needs drive learner behaviour, research shows. Schools often focus on achievement, as it links to learning.
Learners seeking achievement prefer moderately difficult tasks (Atkinson, 1964). These tasks offer challenge, yet learners find them manageable. Learners see feedback as a way to improve (Butler & Winne, 1995). They usually link their success to hard work (Weiner, 1985).
Covington and Beery (1976) found fear makes learners pick easy tasks. Atkinson (1964) and Heckhausen (1991) saw learners choose impossible tasks. Learners blame the task to protect their self-image. This avoidance hinders academic progress for the learner.
These environments increase a learner's feeling of competence. Research from Dweck (2006) and Yeager & Dweck (2012) supports this. Teachers can create these environments. They should present tasks with suitable challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Learners should set goals and assess their progress (Locke & Latham, 2002).
Research on motivation shows that learners differ (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Teachers should know that learners have diverse needs (Dweck, 2006). Classrooms need multiple motivational approaches (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002).
Maslow (1943) said teachers must meet basic learner needs initially. Routines and safe spaces can help. Encourage well-being awareness. Deci & Ryan's (1985) theory says give learners choices. Offer appropriate challenges and build relationships.
Teachers can use Drive Theory with questions to create useful thinking. Expectancy Theory says help learners feel confident (Vroom, 1964). They need clear success routes and learning linked to what matters to them (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).
Researchers such as Covington (2000) suggest teachers build safe spaces. These spaces let learners take risks. Dweck (2006) says praise effort, not just success. Yorke and Knight (2004) see failure as a key part of learner progress.
Research by Deci and Ryan (1985) shows learners need motivation. Teachers can use diverse methods to engage learners in lessons. Understanding theories, like that of Dweck (2006), helps teachers. This makes learning more meaningful for every learner.
Deci and Ryan state learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Meeting these needs should boost motivation (Deci & Ryan). Increased motivation improves learner engagement and outcomes. The framework focuses on internal drive, not rewards.
Maslow (1943) suggests meeting learners' basic needs first. Offer breakfast clubs and routines. Make the classroom safe physically and emotionally. Learners will focus on learning and friendship (Maslow, 1943).
Mastery goals help learners truly understand subjects. This focus helps learners persevere through tough tasks (Dweck, 1986). Mistakes then become chances to learn, building resilience (Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
Incentive Theory shows rewards boost short-term work, not lasting interest. Research shows prizes may hurt a learner's task enjoyment (Journal of Educational Psychology). Focus on competence and choice. Use rewards with care (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Lepper et al., 1973).
Using one strategy for every learner is a common mistake. High pressure goals can cause anxiety in learners lacking confidence (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Relying too much on prizes may create compliance, not real skill practice (Lepper et al., 1973).
Flow Theory says matching challenge to skills improves learner focus and reduces stress. Overwhelming tasks stress learners (researchers). Teachers can engage learners with a 'sweet spot' challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). This builds learner confidence.
Download this free Motivation, Growth Mindset & Student Agency resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.
Student motivation research
Motivation and learning
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/theories-of-motivation#article","headline":"Theories of Motivation: From Maslow to Self-Determination in the Classroom","description":"Compare the major motivation theories (Maslow, Herzberg, Deci and Ryan, Dweck) and how each explains what drives pupils to learn. Practical strategies for...","datePublished":"2023-05-09T10:18:57.902Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T11:00:58.504Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/theories-of-motivation"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/6952551506d131adfe5028c4_69525511c5ec85309f5c7264_theories-of-motivation-infographic.webp","wordCount":2129},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/theories-of-motivation#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Theories of Motivation: From Maslow to Self-Determination in the Classroom","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/theories-of-motivation"}]}]}