Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-DeterminationSixth form students in maroon sweatshirts discuss motivation theories in a modern study space, collaborating closely.

Updated on  

June 5, 2026

Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination

|

May 9, 2023

Major motivation theories compared: Maslow, Herzberg, Deci and Ryan, and Dweck. How each explains what drives learners, and how teachers can apply them.

Build your next lesson freeExplore the toolkit
Copy citation

Main, P (2023, May 09). Theories of Motivation. Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/theories-of-motivation

Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination is a guide to the psychological frameworks that explain learner effort in school. It shows why learners start tasks, avoid them, keep going, or give up. These theories connect needs, goals, expectations, rewards and belonging, from Maslow's account of human motivation (Maslow, 1943) to Self-Determination Theory's focus on autonomy, competence and relatedness.

This connects to the wider context of fundamental theories of learning in modern classroom practice.

Key Takeaways

  1. Balance Choice with Firm Structure: Self-Determination Theory highlights the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Offer learners guided choices in their tasks (such as how they present their findings), but ensure these choices are anchored within clear, predictable classroom routines to build intrinsic motivation safely.
  2. Prioritise Mastery Over Performance: Shift the focus of your feedback away from grades and peer comparison. Encourage 'mastery goals' by praising the learning process, effort, and strategy, ensuring your classroom is a safe environment where errors are viewed as a necessary step rather than a failure.
  3. Build Both Confidence and Relevance: Expectancy-Value Theory dictates that learners will only apply effort if they believe they can succeed *and* see the value in the task. Always make the 'why' explicit to your class, connect topics to real-world relevance, and provide crystal-clear success criteria so they expect to achieve.
  4. Reframe Learner Attributions: How learners explain their successes or failures dictates their future motivation. Actively train your learners to attribute their outcomes to factors they can control, such as the specific effort they applied or the revision strategies they used, rather than a fixed sense of innate ability.
  5. Target the 'Flow' State: To sustain engagement and prevent off-task behaviour, match the difficulty of the task to the learners' current skill levels. Scaffold challenging work carefully so learners are stretched without feeling anxious, while providing extension tasks to prevent boredom.
  6. Diagnose Work Refusal Systematically: When a learner (such as a reluctant Year 8 writer) disengages, use these theories as a diagnostic toolkit. Ask yourself: Do they need a stronger sense of relatedness? Do they need a safer relationship with making mistakes? Or do they simply need a clearer route to success?

◆ Structural Learning
Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination
A deep-dive audio episode

A concise Structural Learning audio episode on Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination, grounded in the curated research dossier and focused on practical classroom use.

Motivation theories are psychological frameworks that explain why learners try, keep going, or stop. They look at internal needs, external incentives, beliefs, goals and social conditions that shape motivation, persistence and goal-directed behaviour in learning.

For teachers, the issue is practical. A Year 8 learner who refuses writing may need clearer success criteria, a safer relationship with error, or a reason to value the task. Recent SDT evidence from 36 education studies involving 11,792 participants found benefits for autonomy, competence and intrinsic motivation (Wang et al., 2024). Even so, the strongest practice combines choice with firm classroom structure.

Main Motivation Theories in Education

Motivation theories explain why learners begin, keep up, or avoid school work. They include need-based accounts such as Maslow (1943), cognitive models such as expectancy-value theory, social accounts such as Vygotsky (1978), retrieval-based evidence from Karpicke (2008), and Self-Determination Theory. This theory links autonomy, competence and relatedness to intrinsic motivation. Teachers use these motivational theories to decide whether a learner needs a safer routine, a clearer route to success, a stronger reason to care, or more structured choice.

Major Theories of Motivation

TheoryKey TheoristCore PrincipleClassroom Application
Self-DeterminationDeci & RyanAutonomy, competence, relatednessOffer choices, optimal challenge
Achievement GoalDweck (2006), AmesMastery vs performance goalsFocus on learning, not grades
Expectancy-ValueEccles, WigfieldExpectation × value = motivationBuild confidence and relevance
AttributionWeinerCausal beliefs affect motivationAttribute success to effort
FlowCsikszentmihalyiOptimal challenge-skill balanceMatch difficulty to ability
Maslow's hierarchy pyramid showing 5 levels of learner needs affecting classroom learning capacity
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in the Classroom

For a quick answer to "What are the five theories of motivation?", teachers can group the field into needs theories, drive theory, expectancy-value theory, achievement motivation theory and Self-Determination Theory. Workplace motivation theory adds Herzberg's hygiene factors. These include salary, job security and working conditions, which prevent dissatisfaction, while motivators such as responsibility and personal growth support job satisfaction. Those hygiene factors help explain employee motivation and why pay alone may not motivate employees, but classroom practice has a different aim: to help learners see value in effort and feel able to act.

Evidence Overview

Chalkface Translator: research evidence in plain teacher language

Academic
Chalkface

Evidence Rating: Load-Bearing Pillars

Emerging (d<0.2)
Promising (d 0.2-0.5)
Robust (d 0.5+)
Foundational (d 0.8+)

Key Takeaways

  1. Addressing learners' basic needs is fundamental for effective learning: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs posits that physiological and safety needs must be met before learners can engage with higher-level cognitive processes (Maslow, 1943). Teachers should therefore ensure a supportive and secure classroom environment, recognising that unmet basic needs can significantly impede a learner's capacity for academic engagement.
  2. supporting autonomy, competence, and relatedness significantly boosts learners' intrinsic motivation: Self-Determination Theory highlights these three psychological needs as important for optimal functioning and growth (Deci & Ryan, 1985). By offering meaningful choices, providing appropriately challenging tasks, and building positive relationships, educators can cultivate a classroom where learners are genuinely engaged and self-driven in their learning.
  3. Learners' motivation is strongly influenced by their belief in success and the perceived value of learning tasks: Expectancy-Value Theory suggests that learners are more likely to exert effort when they expect to succeed and value the task (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002). Teachers can enhance motivation by setting clear, achievable goals and explicitly connecting learning content to learners' interests and future aspirations, thereby increasing both expectancy and value.
  4. Promoting a mastery-oriented classroom environment leads to deeper learning and greater resilience: Achievement Goal Theory distinguishes between mastery goals, focussed on learning and improvement, and performance goals, focussed on demonstrating ability (Ames, 1992). Educators should emphasise effort, progress, and understanding over comparative performance, helping learners develop a growth mindset and persist through challenges.

Deci and Ryan (1985) showed motivation impacts behaviour. Theories explain why learners select certain goals. These theories also explain learners' reactions to setbacks. Dweck (2006) explored sustained effort in learners.

Comparison table of six educational motivation theories showing their key concepts and applications
Side-by-side comparison table: Main Theories of Motivation in Education

Bandura (1977) found that reflection improves how learners think. Learners also feel motivation, and they can take active control of it.

Ryan and Deci (2000) showed motivation affects learner actions. Learners may cheat or skip work when they lack motivation. Teachers can use motivational theories to boost learning (Wigfield & Eccles, 2002).

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and Learner Readiness

Maslow (1943) said learners need basic needs met before learning. Hungry or unsafe learners prioritise survival, hindering lesson focus. Teachers can help by making classrooms safe. They can also support learner needs via breakfast clubs and routines.

Maslow's (1943) hierarchy of needs explains one part of learner motivation: unmet basic needs can crowd out attention, working memory and trust. It is not a full motivation theory for every classroom problem. A hungry learner may still want belonging, recognition and personal growth, so teachers should avoid treating the hierarchy needs model as a rigid checklist.

The familiar Maslow hierarchy pyramid needs caution. Maslow (1943) described relative priority among needs, but Bridgman, Cummings and Ballard (2019) argue that he did not create the classroom pyramid now found in many posters. The Maslow hierarchy needs model is better read as a prompt for noticing barriers, not as proof that learning must wait until every lower need is fully met.

In practice, needs operate in parallel. Safety, belonging, esteem and curiosity can all influence human motivation in the same lesson. A Year 6 learner coping with unstable housing may still work hard for a trusted teacher, especially when the task offers social connection, visible progress and a clear route to success.

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Study Notes preview
◆ Structural Learning
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Study Notes
Study notesOne-page revision sheet

Download a one-page study note for Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, with the key ideas, limitations and classroom links in one place.

Something went wrong - please try again.

Deci and Ryan (1985) showed that motivation drives what learners do. Self-Determination Theory considers both positive and negative behaviours. In class, motivation shapes learner behaviour.

Maslow (1943) showed learners need basic needs met first. Learning is reduced if physiological and safety needs are not fulfilled. This hierarchy helps teachers understand learner motivation.

Maslow (1943) showed motivation is complex; teachers should think about it. Meeting learner needs and encouragement are useful. Deci and Ryan's (1985) research offers more support.

Maslows hierarchy of needs
Maslows hierarchy of needs

Drive Theory and Learner Motivation

Drive Theory (Hull, 1943) says learners are motivated by inner tension. This tension feels uncomfortable until a need is met. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.

In class, this can mean curiosity gaps or missing knowledge. Teachers can use challenging questions to help learners solve problems (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

Hull's Drive Theory (1940s) says motivation comes from biological drives. Learners try to lessen internal tension or imbalance, Hull stated (1940s). This theory explains why learners behave as they do.

Learners act to lessen drives like hunger or curiosity. Hull (1943) called this the "drive-reduction cycle." Tension inspires action to restore balance (Hull, 1943; Spence, 1956).

Drive Theory appears in classrooms when learners face interesting problems. They show cognitive drives, which are mental pushes to find an answer (Hull, 1943).

This creates mental tension. Learners then seek answers, ask questions, and keep working until they resolve the task.

Loewenstein (1994) noted puzzling questions create learner interest. Berlyne (1960) showed contradictory facts grab learner focus. Bjork & Bjork (2011) suggest hard tasks improve learner learning. These struggles improve learner results overall.

Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination, slide preview
◆ Structural Learning
Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination
Classroom-readyWhat the theory means in practice

Theories of Motivation in practice, a classroom-ready briefing you can use this week.

Something went wrong, please try again.
✓ On its way. Download the slides now.

Self-Determination Theory and Classroom Engagement

Deci and Ryan (1985) argued that learners need autonomy, competence and relatedness. But autonomy support does not mean letting learners do anything they want. Wang et al. (2024) found that SDT-based education interventions can support psychological needs and intrinsic motivation, especially when choice is paired with clear expectations, scaffolding and feedback. In a lesson, that might mean learners choose which evidence to use while the teacher keeps the success criteria fixed.

Deci and Ryan (1985) explain how self-determination shapes learner motivation. Their theory sets out different kinds of motivation. Deci and Ryan (2000) state that learners need certain things before they feel motivated.

Deci and Ryan (1985) said learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Meeting these needs helps build learners' intrinsic motivation. Learners then do activities for the fun of it (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

Self-Determination Theory has a strong effect on learning design. Research by Deci and Ryan (2000) shows that learners engage more in supportive settings. Learners also get better results and feel happier (Ryan & Deci, 2017).

Ryan and Deci (2020) say autonomy support means giving learners choices. Give clear feedback and manageable challenges to support competence. Learners feel valued when you create inclusive classrooms (Ryan & Deci, 2020).

Expectancy Theory and Learner Achievement

Expectancy Theory explains learner motivation through three parts. Vroom (1964) said learners must expect that they can succeed. They must also believe that success brings rewards. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.

Porter & Lawler (1968) added that learners must value these rewards. Learners work hard when they think goals are achievable. The theory helps teachers address learner disengagement.

Vroom's Expectancy Theory (Vroom) links learner motivation to three things: what learners expect, how useful it seems, and how much they value it. Learners weigh up these parts and then choose how much effort to use.

According to Vroom (1964), expectancy is when a learner thinks effort yields success. This means learners believe they can master material (Bandura, 1977). Learners with low expectancy might show learned helplessness (Seligman, 1975).

Intrinsic Motivation Study Notes preview
◆ Structural Learning
Intrinsic Motivation Study Notes
Study notesOne-page revision sheet

Download a one-page study note for Intrinsic Motivation, with the key ideas, limitations and classroom links in one place.

Something went wrong - please try again.

Research shows learners need to see effort leads to results (Vroom, 1964). Learners connect work with rewards, such as grades or future chances (Bandura, 1977). Seeing this link boosts learner motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985).

According to Wigfield and Eccles (2000), learners must value results. Learners need to believe effort leads to success, as per expectancy-value theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000). If learners don't value the outcome, motivation decreases (Eccles et al., 1983).

Expectancy Theory helps you pinpoint learner motivation issues. Learners may lack confidence (Vroom, 1964). They might not see the work's point (Porter & Lawler, 1968). Learners may also undervalue the goals (Lawler, 1973).

Applying Achievement Motivation Theory

Learners are more motivated when they want success than when they fear failure. Atkinson (1957) showed that success-focused learners choose hard tasks and work harder. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.

McClelland (1961) found that learners who fear failure avoid risks and give up. Dweck (2006) recommends valuing effort and offering good challenges to build learner motivation. For related guidance, see our article on Expectancy Theory.

McClelland and Atkinson's Achievement Motivation Theory explains learner success. It helps teachers understand the achievement choices learners make each day. UK schools find this theory very useful.

Atkinson (1964) and McClelland (1961) found learners have achievement, affiliation, and power motives. These needs drive learner behaviour, research shows. Schools often focus on achievement, as it links to learning.

Learners seeking achievement prefer moderately difficult tasks (Atkinson, 1964). These tasks offer challenge, yet learners find them manageable. Learners see feedback as a way to improve (Butler & Winne, 1995). They usually link their success to hard work (Weiner, 1985).

Humanistic Psychology Study Notes preview
◆ Structural Learning
Humanistic Psychology Study Notes
Study notesOne-page revision sheet

Download a one-page study note for Humanistic Psychology, with the key ideas, limitations and classroom links in one place.

Something went wrong - please try again.

Covington and Beery (1976) found fear makes learners pick easy tasks. Atkinson (1964) and Heckhausen (1991) saw learners choose impossible tasks. Learners blame the task to protect their self-image. This avoidance hinders academic progress for the learner.

These environments help learners feel more competent. Research from Dweck (2006) and Yeager & Dweck (2012) supports this.

Teachers can create these environments by setting tasks with suitable challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Learners should also set goals and assess their progress (Locke & Latham, 2002).

Practical Applications of Motivation Theories in the Classroom

Research on motivation shows that learners differ (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Teachers should know that learners have diverse needs (Dweck, 2006). Classrooms need multiple motivational approaches (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002).

Maslow (1943) said teachers must first meet learners' basic needs. Routines and safe spaces can help, along with well-being awareness.

Deci & Ryan's (1985) theory says teachers should give learners choices. They should also offer appropriate challenges and build relationships.

Teachers can use Drive Theory with questions to create useful thinking. Expectancy Theory says help learners feel confident (Vroom, 1964). They need clear success routes and learning linked to what matters to them (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).

Researchers such as Covington (2000) suggest teachers build safe spaces. These spaces let learners take risks. Dweck (2006) says praise effort, not just success. Yorke and Knight (2004) see failure as a key part of learner progress.

Research by Deci and Ryan (1985) shows learners need motivation. Teachers can use diverse methods to engage learners in lessons. Understanding theories, like that of Dweck (2006), helps teachers. This makes learning more meaningful for every learner.

Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Self-Determination Theory in education?

Deci and Ryan state that learners need autonomy, competence, and relatedness. In simple terms, they need choice, a sense of skill, and a sense of belonging. Meeting these needs should boost motivation (Deci & Ryan).

When motivation rises, learner engagement and outcomes improve. The framework focuses on internal drive, not rewards.

How do teachers implement Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in the classroom?

Maslow (1943) suggests meeting learners' basic needs first. Offer breakfast clubs and routines. Make the classroom safe physically and emotionally. Learners will focus on learning and friendship (Maslow, 1943).

What are the benefits of using Achievement Goal Theory for learning?

Mastery goals help learners truly understand subjects. This focus helps learners persevere through tough tasks (Dweck, 1986). Mistakes then become chances to learn, building resilience (Yeager & Dweck, 2012).

What the Research Says About Rewards and Learner Motivation

Incentive Theory shows rewards boost short-term work, not lasting interest. Research shows prizes may hurt a learner's task enjoyment (Lepper et al., 1973). Focus on competence and choice. Use rewards with care (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Lepper et al., 1973).

What are common mistakes when using motivational theories in schools?

Using one strategy for every learner is a common mistake. High pressure goals can cause anxiety in learners lacking confidence (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Relying too much on prizes may create compliance, not real skill practice (Lepper et al., 1973).

Motivational Strategies for Learners Who Struggle with Anxiety

Flow Theory says matching challenge to skills improves learner focus and reduces stress. Overwhelming tasks stress learners (researchers). Teachers can engage learners with a 'sweet spot' challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). This builds learner confidence.

Free Resource Pack

Download this free Motivation, Growth Mindset & Learner Agency resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.

Free Resource Pack

Motivation & Mindset Toolkit

Essential resources for supporting learner agency and a growth mindset in your school.

Motivation & Mindset Toolkit, 4 resources
Growth MindsetLearner AgencyMotivationClassroom DisplayCPD VisualTeacher Quick ReferenceLearner Self-TalkLearning Strategies

Download your free bundle

Fill in your details below and we'll send the resource pack straight to your inbox.

Quick survey (helps us create better resources)

How confident do you feel in your ability to effectively build learner motivation, a growth mindset, and learner agency in your classroom?

Not confident
Somewhat confident
Moderately confident
Confident
Very confident

To what extent do you feel your school culture and colleagues actively support and promote growth mindset and learner agency?

Not at all
Minimally
Moderately
Significantly
Consistently

How consistently do you implement strategies to develop learner agency and a growth mindset in your lessons and classroom environment?

Rarely
Occasionally
Sometimes
Often
Always

Your resource pack is ready

We've also sent a copy to your email. Check your inbox.

Limitations and Critiques

Motivation theories are useful, but several claims need care. First, Maslow's hierarchy needs is often shown as a fixed pyramid, although Maslow (1943) did not draw that classroom graphic. Wahba and Bridwell (1976) found weak evidence for a strict sequence of needs, and Bridgman, Cummings and Ballard (2019) traced the familiar pyramid to later management writing. This matters because a learner can still seek belonging, status or personal growth while hunger, safety or housing remain unsettled.

Second, many motivational theories come from Western, educated groups. Hofstede (1984) argued that models based on individual choice may fit individualist cultures better than collectivist communities. Teachers should keep this limit in mind.

The same caution applies to Vygotsky (1978). Social mediation, where others support learning, is powerful. Yet the form of help, talk and authority differs across classrooms and cultures.

Third, classroom interventions can be weaker than the theory suggests. Growth mindset work linked to Dweck (2006) shows small average effects in meta-analysis, and large-scale trials have not consistently raised attainment (Sisk et al., 2018; EEF, 2019). Retrieval research linked to Karpicke (2008) is strong, but early studies often used controlled tasks, short timescales and older learners, so teachers still need subject-specific checks.

Finally, Self-Determination Theory can be misread as just giving learners more choice. Wang et al. (2024) found positive effects from SDT-based interventions. Even so, autonomy support still needs clear routines, feedback and structure.

Despite these limits, the field remains useful for teachers. It helps them test why effort, persistence and belonging vary across real lessons.

References

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success.

Karpicke, J. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.

Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

◆ Structural Learning
Theories of Motivation: Maslow to Self-Determination: Quick-Check Quiz
10-question self-test
Q1 of 10
0%

Further Reading

Student motivation research

Motivation and learning

15 Strategies to Enhance Learner Motivation

Cognitive Science Platform

Make Thinking Visible

Open a free account and help organise learners' thinking with evidence-based graphic organisers. Reduce cognitive load and guide schema building dynamically.

Create Free Account No credit card required
Paul Main, Founder of Structural Learning
About the Author
Paul Main
Founder & Metacognition Researcher

Paul Main is an educator and metacognition researcher who founded Structural Learning in 2002. With a psychology degree from the University of Sunderland and 22+ years helping schools embed thinking skills, he bridges the gap between educational research and classroom practice. Fellow of the RSA and Chartered College of Teaching, with 128+ Google Scholar citations.

More →

Psychology

Back to Blog