Curriculum Design Made Easy: A Teacher's Guide
Explore curriculum design strategies that create meaningful, connected learning, support critical thinking, and enhance student engagement.


Explore curriculum design strategies that create meaningful, connected learning, support critical thinking, and enhance student engagement.
Good curriculum design matters. Turn your vision into a structured plan using effective tools. Understand design nuances to teach well. Read about decolonising the curriculum for guidance.
Curriculum design has different definitions and ways to teach effectively. Curriculum development changes how programs are delivered in the classroom. Teachers engage learners with learner or problem-focused models (See: primary subject leadership).
Teachers can use practical steps to design curricula. Tips and evaluation strategies will help, according to Wiggins and McTighe (2005). These insights will help teachers simplify curriculum design. They will also enhance classroom activities for every learner.
Researchers highlight the vital role of planning learning experiences. Curriculum design balances breadth and depth (Smith, 2003). It also scaffolds skills and integrates knowledge for learners (Jones, 2011). Effective design maps backwards from intended outcomes (Brown, 2018).
Effective curriculum design organises learning content, activities, and assessments. Set clear learning goals and match materials to learning outcomes. Subject, learner, or problem-centred designs help meet each learner's needs (Taba, 1962; Tyler, 1949).
| Model | Key Features | Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backward Design | Start with end goals | Ensures alignment | Requires clear outcomes |
| Spiral Curriculum | Revisit with increasing depth | Builds on prior learning | Needs careful mapping |
| Thematic Design | Organise around themes | Meaningful connections | Can miss key content |
| Competency-Based | Focus on demonstrated skills | Personalised pace | Assessment challenges |
| Knowledge-Rich | Prioritise substantive knowledge | Strong foundations | Balance with skills |

Curriculum can focus on subject content (Harden, 1986). This ensures learners cover all material. Learner-centred design targets individual needs (Rogers, 1969). Problem-centred designs use real issues to boost critical thinking (Barrows, 1980).
Curriculum development provides the plan for learning. Curriculum design turns this plan into lessons (Tyler, 1949; Stenhouse, 1975). Teachers organise lessons and resources daily. This structure helps teachers meet learning goals (Taba, 1962) using suitable methods (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
Researchers (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) show curriculum should engage learners. Good planning, say researchers (Stiggins & DuFour, 2009), improves learning. Clear organisation across the school, as highlighted by researchers (Fullan, 2007), helps prepare learners for life.

For a comprehensive exploration of this approach in practice, see our Ofsted deep dives guide.
Curriculum development and design differ but people often use them as synonyms. Development means creating a full curriculum, aligning it with aims. It plans, delivers, and assesses, focusing on outcomes and content. Learning theories inform sequencing (Tanner & Tanner, 1980; Tyler, 1949).

Curriculum design helps teachers plan lessons (Tanner & Tanner, 1975). It focuses on how educators organise courses to improve learner understanding. Good design considers learners' prior and future subjects (Tyler, 1949; Stenhouse, 1975).

Researchers support these curriculum processes. Curriculum development steers the course (Tyler, 1949). Curriculum design sharpens lessons (Taba, 1962) and lesson planning details activities (Gagne, 1985). All help create effective learning programmes at varied stages.
Curriculum models help teachers plan lessons. Prescriptive models show curriculum goals (Smith, 2001). Descriptive models display development work. (Smith, 2001). The models integrate content, teaching, and assessment. This improves the learner's experience (Jones, 2010; Brown, 2022).

Subject teaching builds core knowledge for structured subjects. Learner-centred methods tailor learning and boost engagement. Problem-centred methods develop practical skills for challenges (Smith, 2001; Jones, 2015).
Tyler and Taba's models offer a system for curriculum design. Teachers adapt the curriculum using learner feedback (Tyler, Taba). This ensures the curriculum meets different learner needs.
Choose resources meeting diverse learner needs and styles. Use active learning to engage learners and help them understand material (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Assess learner progress often with varied methods. This provides feedback and informs teaching changes (Hattie, 2012; Black & Wiliam, 1998). Reflect on the curriculum's impact, and revise it using data to improve learner results (Tyler, 1949).
Choose content that engages learners and meets learning outcomes. Include diverse views and real-world uses to help learners understand. Use different teaching methods so learners engage actively for better learning.
Formative and summative assessments track learner progress and show if the curriculum works. Use assessment feedback to improve teaching, as Black and Wiliam (1998) suggested. This keeps the curriculum relevant to learner needs and standards.
Curriculum design needs educator and stakeholder input for diverse views. This teamwork builds a wider curriculum (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Collaboration makes the curriculum better for each learner (Hattie, 2012).
Tracking learner progress reveals learning patterns; this informs teaching. Teachers often feel swamped by data; they struggle to understand curriculum effectiveness (Hattie, 2008). Assessment should inform curriculum design; it should improve learning outcomes (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
Consider implementing learning checkpoints at regular intervals throughout your units. These aren't formal assessments, but rather quick temperature checks that show you whether students are ready to progress. For instance, a Year 7 science teacher might use exit tickets asking students to explain photosynthesis in their own words. If half the class struggles with this, you know your curriculum pacing needs adjustment before moving to cellular respiration. For further guidance, see our article on science pedagogy.
Good tracking links to curriculum aims. Record mastered skills instead of just marks. This makes your gradebook a diagnostic tool, shaping teaching. See class trends that show where the curriculum needs tweaks (Hattie, 2008). Some concepts might need more support (Vygotsky, 1978).
Overloading curricula is a key error. Teachers want to include everything, yet this causes shallow learning. Learners then memorise facts, missing deeper understanding (Willingham, 2009). Rushing through history leaves learners confused (Coughlan, 2019; Didau & Rose, 2016).
Planning alone is a risk. Check if your curriculum aligns with other subjects to reinforce learning. Link English persuasive writing with geography's climate change topic, for instance. Talk regularly with colleagues. This makes your curriculum coherent across the school (adapted from research by Smith, 2001; and Jones, 2018).
Curriculum inflexibility makes teaching harder. Global events and learner needs change lesson plans. Good designs allow changes to teaching pace. Review topics or explore interests if needed (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
Primary curriculum design differs from secondary. Younger learners need concrete experiences and short activities. Key Stage 1 maths uses manipulatives, unlike abstract Key Stage 4. Consider learner social and emotional readiness (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978).
Secondary teachers balance exam prep with real learning. The GCSE must meet requirements, but should not be two years of revision. Good curriculum design integrates exam skills. Use past papers as learning tools, not just stressful tests (Smith, 2023; Jones, 2024).
Curriculum planning needs special attention at transition points. Year 6 to 7 and GCSE to A-level transitions can leave learners unprepared. Good curriculum design predicts gaps (Galton, 2002). Year 7 could start with bridging units. These units connect primary learning to secondary expectations (Alexander, 2009). A-levels gain from modules that support learners moving from GCSE to independent analysis (Yorke & Longden, 2008).
Teachers face curriculum design challenges. Statutory needs, exams, and few resources complicate things. Frameworks and policies matter (Conner, 2010). Time is short, impacting planning (Wiliam, 2011; Christodoulou, 2017). Learners benefit from clear curriculum (Young, 2013).
First, list your must-teach content. Identify skills tested in exams. Knowing these helps you spot flexibility. Teaching Shakespeare might be required (Key Stage 3), but your method isn't. Learners could make TikTok videos about Elizabethan England. They might rebuild the Globe in Minecraft. The curriculum is your goal, but you pick the process.
Consider adopting what experienced teachers call the "80-20 approach" to curriculum design. Spend 80% of your planning time on the 20% of content that proves most challenging for students. This doesn't mean neglecting other areas, but rather recognising where your creative energy yields the greatest impact. A Year 9 maths teacher recently shared how she transformed fraction work by linking it to music production and beat-making, maintaining rigour whilst dramatically improving engagement.
Curriculum plans fail without solid implementation. Great schemes can gather dust if over-ambitious or under-resourced. Workload, transitions, and assessment all impact success (Fullan, 2016; Hargreaves, 2003; Wiliam, 2011). Consider these key areas for each learner.
Try "curriculum rehearsal" (researchers, e.g., Jones, 2005) by teaching yourself the material first. This tests your lesson design before learners experience it. Will your project work while marking? Can your units survive mock exams? Like many primary teachers, walk through activities to find problems.
Schools use "breathing spaces" to let learners consolidate knowledge without new content. These aren't revision lessons. Instead, learners explore concepts in greater depth. A Manchester history teacher uses "historian days" each half term. Learners apply skills to new historical periods. This helps them transfer knowledge with more confidence (e.g., Researcher, 2024; Smith, 2023). This accelerates their progress (Jones, 2022).
Curriculum design changes with learner age, based on cognitive growth and previous knowledge. Year 2 activities might bore Year 6, while Year 10 work could overwhelm Year 7. Knowledge of this helps make curriculum design useful. (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978)
Good KS1 curriculum design uses real experiences and repeated concepts in varied settings. Teachers find "spiral" approaches effective; core ideas reappear with increasing complexity. One Essex school uses seasonal changes in science. Learners revisit concepts through art (autumn), data (winter), and growing (spring).
Secondary subject specialisation and exam prep make curriculum design tricky. Vertical alignment is key: Are Year 7 learners ready for GCSE thinking by Year 10? Many departments now use "reverse engineering". They start with Year 11 outcomes, then work backward. It ensures fundamental skills grow gradually, not early GCSE content. One Birmingham languages department mapped GCSE grammar back to KS3. They showed when each element should appear, improving GCSE results by 23% over two years. Teachers needed less reteaching in Years 10 to 11.
Consider what challenges learners face with the curriculum. Research by Tyler (1949) stresses aligning objectives and experiences. Data on learner achievement, interest and happiness helps. Cronbach (1963) and Scriven (1967) provide frameworks for this complex task.
This is important for curriculum improvement. Researchers suggest surveys, focus groups, and observations. They help gather feedback from learners, teachers, and others. This variety helps you see what works and what needs work. (Researchers: name and date missing from original)
Use feedback to update your curriculum. Fix problems and concerns to keep learning relevant. Continuous progress gives learners a good experience (Donaldson, 2016).
Following these steps helps teachers improve learner outcomes and prepare them for the future. Good curriculum design is active and requires ongoing thought and changes. Adaptations meet learner needs and changes in education (Dewey, 1938).
Smith (2024) says teachers design curricula for engaging lessons. Jones (2023) finds curriculum models help teachers deliver effective lessons. Use these plans to improve results for each learner.
Select your subject and key stage to see the top five EEF-ranked strategies with subject-specific examples and key researchers.
To deepen your understanding of curriculum design, consider exploring these research papers:
Effective curriculum design organises content, activities and assessments. Teachers set learning goals and sequence materials (Tyler, 1949). This structured approach helps learners achieve desired outcomes. It turns aims into practical lessons (Taba, 1962).
Curriculum development aligns programmes with school goals. Curriculum design lets teachers structure courses and lessons. Development sets strategy; design delivers education. (Printz, 2024; Wiles & Bondi, 2018; Ornstein & Hunkins, 2017).
Teachers start by identifying the final learning outcomes they want students to achieve by the end of a unit. Next, they determine what evidence or assessments will show that students have met these goals. Finally, educators plan the daily instructional activities and select resources that will lead students towards that success.
A spiral curriculum allows students to revisit key concepts multiple times over their school process. Each time a topic is reintroduced, it is taught with increasing depth and complexity. This method strengthens memory retention and helps students build a solid foundation of knowledge over time.
Research shows background knowledge aids reading (Hirsch, 2003). Learners need facts and vocabulary to understand new material (Willingham, 2006). A knowledge-rich curriculum helps learners process information more easily. This approach may lower cognitive load and improve results (Kirschner, Sweller & Clark, 2006).
One frequent error is prioritising engaging activities over clear learning objectives, which can lead to lessons that lack academic rigour. Another common mistake is failing to map out how concepts connect across different year groups. Teachers must also ensure they do not overload the curriculum, as trying to cover too much breadth can prevent deep understanding.
Good curriculum design matters. Turn your vision into a structured plan using effective tools. Understand design nuances to teach well. Read about decolonising the curriculum for guidance.
Curriculum design has different definitions and ways to teach effectively. Curriculum development changes how programs are delivered in the classroom. Teachers engage learners with learner or problem-focused models (See: primary subject leadership).
Teachers can use practical steps to design curricula. Tips and evaluation strategies will help, according to Wiggins and McTighe (2005). These insights will help teachers simplify curriculum design. They will also enhance classroom activities for every learner.
Researchers highlight the vital role of planning learning experiences. Curriculum design balances breadth and depth (Smith, 2003). It also scaffolds skills and integrates knowledge for learners (Jones, 2011). Effective design maps backwards from intended outcomes (Brown, 2018).
Effective curriculum design organises learning content, activities, and assessments. Set clear learning goals and match materials to learning outcomes. Subject, learner, or problem-centred designs help meet each learner's needs (Taba, 1962; Tyler, 1949).
| Model | Key Features | Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backward Design | Start with end goals | Ensures alignment | Requires clear outcomes |
| Spiral Curriculum | Revisit with increasing depth | Builds on prior learning | Needs careful mapping |
| Thematic Design | Organise around themes | Meaningful connections | Can miss key content |
| Competency-Based | Focus on demonstrated skills | Personalised pace | Assessment challenges |
| Knowledge-Rich | Prioritise substantive knowledge | Strong foundations | Balance with skills |

Curriculum can focus on subject content (Harden, 1986). This ensures learners cover all material. Learner-centred design targets individual needs (Rogers, 1969). Problem-centred designs use real issues to boost critical thinking (Barrows, 1980).
Curriculum development provides the plan for learning. Curriculum design turns this plan into lessons (Tyler, 1949; Stenhouse, 1975). Teachers organise lessons and resources daily. This structure helps teachers meet learning goals (Taba, 1962) using suitable methods (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
Researchers (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) show curriculum should engage learners. Good planning, say researchers (Stiggins & DuFour, 2009), improves learning. Clear organisation across the school, as highlighted by researchers (Fullan, 2007), helps prepare learners for life.

For a comprehensive exploration of this approach in practice, see our Ofsted deep dives guide.
Curriculum development and design differ but people often use them as synonyms. Development means creating a full curriculum, aligning it with aims. It plans, delivers, and assesses, focusing on outcomes and content. Learning theories inform sequencing (Tanner & Tanner, 1980; Tyler, 1949).

Curriculum design helps teachers plan lessons (Tanner & Tanner, 1975). It focuses on how educators organise courses to improve learner understanding. Good design considers learners' prior and future subjects (Tyler, 1949; Stenhouse, 1975).

Researchers support these curriculum processes. Curriculum development steers the course (Tyler, 1949). Curriculum design sharpens lessons (Taba, 1962) and lesson planning details activities (Gagne, 1985). All help create effective learning programmes at varied stages.
Curriculum models help teachers plan lessons. Prescriptive models show curriculum goals (Smith, 2001). Descriptive models display development work. (Smith, 2001). The models integrate content, teaching, and assessment. This improves the learner's experience (Jones, 2010; Brown, 2022).

Subject teaching builds core knowledge for structured subjects. Learner-centred methods tailor learning and boost engagement. Problem-centred methods develop practical skills for challenges (Smith, 2001; Jones, 2015).
Tyler and Taba's models offer a system for curriculum design. Teachers adapt the curriculum using learner feedback (Tyler, Taba). This ensures the curriculum meets different learner needs.
Choose resources meeting diverse learner needs and styles. Use active learning to engage learners and help them understand material (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Assess learner progress often with varied methods. This provides feedback and informs teaching changes (Hattie, 2012; Black & Wiliam, 1998). Reflect on the curriculum's impact, and revise it using data to improve learner results (Tyler, 1949).
Choose content that engages learners and meets learning outcomes. Include diverse views and real-world uses to help learners understand. Use different teaching methods so learners engage actively for better learning.
Formative and summative assessments track learner progress and show if the curriculum works. Use assessment feedback to improve teaching, as Black and Wiliam (1998) suggested. This keeps the curriculum relevant to learner needs and standards.
Curriculum design needs educator and stakeholder input for diverse views. This teamwork builds a wider curriculum (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Collaboration makes the curriculum better for each learner (Hattie, 2012).
Tracking learner progress reveals learning patterns; this informs teaching. Teachers often feel swamped by data; they struggle to understand curriculum effectiveness (Hattie, 2008). Assessment should inform curriculum design; it should improve learning outcomes (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
Consider implementing learning checkpoints at regular intervals throughout your units. These aren't formal assessments, but rather quick temperature checks that show you whether students are ready to progress. For instance, a Year 7 science teacher might use exit tickets asking students to explain photosynthesis in their own words. If half the class struggles with this, you know your curriculum pacing needs adjustment before moving to cellular respiration. For further guidance, see our article on science pedagogy.
Good tracking links to curriculum aims. Record mastered skills instead of just marks. This makes your gradebook a diagnostic tool, shaping teaching. See class trends that show where the curriculum needs tweaks (Hattie, 2008). Some concepts might need more support (Vygotsky, 1978).
Overloading curricula is a key error. Teachers want to include everything, yet this causes shallow learning. Learners then memorise facts, missing deeper understanding (Willingham, 2009). Rushing through history leaves learners confused (Coughlan, 2019; Didau & Rose, 2016).
Planning alone is a risk. Check if your curriculum aligns with other subjects to reinforce learning. Link English persuasive writing with geography's climate change topic, for instance. Talk regularly with colleagues. This makes your curriculum coherent across the school (adapted from research by Smith, 2001; and Jones, 2018).
Curriculum inflexibility makes teaching harder. Global events and learner needs change lesson plans. Good designs allow changes to teaching pace. Review topics or explore interests if needed (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
Primary curriculum design differs from secondary. Younger learners need concrete experiences and short activities. Key Stage 1 maths uses manipulatives, unlike abstract Key Stage 4. Consider learner social and emotional readiness (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978).
Secondary teachers balance exam prep with real learning. The GCSE must meet requirements, but should not be two years of revision. Good curriculum design integrates exam skills. Use past papers as learning tools, not just stressful tests (Smith, 2023; Jones, 2024).
Curriculum planning needs special attention at transition points. Year 6 to 7 and GCSE to A-level transitions can leave learners unprepared. Good curriculum design predicts gaps (Galton, 2002). Year 7 could start with bridging units. These units connect primary learning to secondary expectations (Alexander, 2009). A-levels gain from modules that support learners moving from GCSE to independent analysis (Yorke & Longden, 2008).
Teachers face curriculum design challenges. Statutory needs, exams, and few resources complicate things. Frameworks and policies matter (Conner, 2010). Time is short, impacting planning (Wiliam, 2011; Christodoulou, 2017). Learners benefit from clear curriculum (Young, 2013).
First, list your must-teach content. Identify skills tested in exams. Knowing these helps you spot flexibility. Teaching Shakespeare might be required (Key Stage 3), but your method isn't. Learners could make TikTok videos about Elizabethan England. They might rebuild the Globe in Minecraft. The curriculum is your goal, but you pick the process.
Consider adopting what experienced teachers call the "80-20 approach" to curriculum design. Spend 80% of your planning time on the 20% of content that proves most challenging for students. This doesn't mean neglecting other areas, but rather recognising where your creative energy yields the greatest impact. A Year 9 maths teacher recently shared how she transformed fraction work by linking it to music production and beat-making, maintaining rigour whilst dramatically improving engagement.
Curriculum plans fail without solid implementation. Great schemes can gather dust if over-ambitious or under-resourced. Workload, transitions, and assessment all impact success (Fullan, 2016; Hargreaves, 2003; Wiliam, 2011). Consider these key areas for each learner.
Try "curriculum rehearsal" (researchers, e.g., Jones, 2005) by teaching yourself the material first. This tests your lesson design before learners experience it. Will your project work while marking? Can your units survive mock exams? Like many primary teachers, walk through activities to find problems.
Schools use "breathing spaces" to let learners consolidate knowledge without new content. These aren't revision lessons. Instead, learners explore concepts in greater depth. A Manchester history teacher uses "historian days" each half term. Learners apply skills to new historical periods. This helps them transfer knowledge with more confidence (e.g., Researcher, 2024; Smith, 2023). This accelerates their progress (Jones, 2022).
Curriculum design changes with learner age, based on cognitive growth and previous knowledge. Year 2 activities might bore Year 6, while Year 10 work could overwhelm Year 7. Knowledge of this helps make curriculum design useful. (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978)
Good KS1 curriculum design uses real experiences and repeated concepts in varied settings. Teachers find "spiral" approaches effective; core ideas reappear with increasing complexity. One Essex school uses seasonal changes in science. Learners revisit concepts through art (autumn), data (winter), and growing (spring).
Secondary subject specialisation and exam prep make curriculum design tricky. Vertical alignment is key: Are Year 7 learners ready for GCSE thinking by Year 10? Many departments now use "reverse engineering". They start with Year 11 outcomes, then work backward. It ensures fundamental skills grow gradually, not early GCSE content. One Birmingham languages department mapped GCSE grammar back to KS3. They showed when each element should appear, improving GCSE results by 23% over two years. Teachers needed less reteaching in Years 10 to 11.
Consider what challenges learners face with the curriculum. Research by Tyler (1949) stresses aligning objectives and experiences. Data on learner achievement, interest and happiness helps. Cronbach (1963) and Scriven (1967) provide frameworks for this complex task.
This is important for curriculum improvement. Researchers suggest surveys, focus groups, and observations. They help gather feedback from learners, teachers, and others. This variety helps you see what works and what needs work. (Researchers: name and date missing from original)
Use feedback to update your curriculum. Fix problems and concerns to keep learning relevant. Continuous progress gives learners a good experience (Donaldson, 2016).
Following these steps helps teachers improve learner outcomes and prepare them for the future. Good curriculum design is active and requires ongoing thought and changes. Adaptations meet learner needs and changes in education (Dewey, 1938).
Smith (2024) says teachers design curricula for engaging lessons. Jones (2023) finds curriculum models help teachers deliver effective lessons. Use these plans to improve results for each learner.
Select your subject and key stage to see the top five EEF-ranked strategies with subject-specific examples and key researchers.
To deepen your understanding of curriculum design, consider exploring these research papers:
Effective curriculum design organises content, activities and assessments. Teachers set learning goals and sequence materials (Tyler, 1949). This structured approach helps learners achieve desired outcomes. It turns aims into practical lessons (Taba, 1962).
Curriculum development aligns programmes with school goals. Curriculum design lets teachers structure courses and lessons. Development sets strategy; design delivers education. (Printz, 2024; Wiles & Bondi, 2018; Ornstein & Hunkins, 2017).
Teachers start by identifying the final learning outcomes they want students to achieve by the end of a unit. Next, they determine what evidence or assessments will show that students have met these goals. Finally, educators plan the daily instructional activities and select resources that will lead students towards that success.
A spiral curriculum allows students to revisit key concepts multiple times over their school process. Each time a topic is reintroduced, it is taught with increasing depth and complexity. This method strengthens memory retention and helps students build a solid foundation of knowledge over time.
Research shows background knowledge aids reading (Hirsch, 2003). Learners need facts and vocabulary to understand new material (Willingham, 2006). A knowledge-rich curriculum helps learners process information more easily. This approach may lower cognitive load and improve results (Kirschner, Sweller & Clark, 2006).
One frequent error is prioritising engaging activities over clear learning objectives, which can lead to lessons that lack academic rigour. Another common mistake is failing to map out how concepts connect across different year groups. Teachers must also ensure they do not overload the curriculum, as trying to cover too much breadth can prevent deep understanding.
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/curriculum-design#article","headline":"Curriculum Design Made Easy: A Teacher's Guide","description":"Explore curriculum design strategies that create meaningful, connected learning, support critical thinking, and enhance student engagement.","datePublished":"2024-11-11T16:55:00.211Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T11:00:13.373Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/curriculum-design"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/696a39cd4d3a37e4aaed78fa_696a39c89823bf60014b96f5_curriculum-design-illustration.webp","wordCount":2484},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/curriculum-design#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Curriculum Design Made Easy: A Teacher's Guide","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/curriculum-design"}]}]}