Speaking and Listening Topics: Building Oracy Skills
Explore engaging topics that enhance speaking and listening skills. Access practical ideas for classroom discussions, debates, and presentations to foster.


Explore engaging topics that enhance speaking and listening skills. Access practical ideas for classroom discussions, debates, and presentations to foster.
Speaking and Listening Topics: Building Oracy Skills is a teacher guide for planning talk and listening tasks across the curriculum. It covers discussion, debate, presentation and listening, all of which help build oracy. Oracy means learning to use spoken language to reason, explain, listen, question and adapt communication for a clear purpose. The Education Endowment Foundation reports that well planned and clearly taught oral language approaches can add around five to six months of progress (Education Endowment Foundation, 2021).
In a Year 5 science lesson, learners might first prepare vocabulary about evaporation. They could then rehearse a claim with a partner, challenge evidence in a small group, and record one improved explanation before writing. This matters because strong classroom talk is not just about confidence. It also depends on subject knowledge, taught sentence stems, careful listening routines and assessment that values different ways of communicating.
Oracy skills are taught speaking and listening behaviours. They help learners explain ideas, listen actively and build on others' points, question evidence and adapt language for different audiences. Good classroom talk needs more than confidence, so learners need subject knowledge, sentence stems, turn-taking routines and time to practise before public talk. This guide gives age-appropriate speaking and listening topics, with practical ways to build oracy as part of reading and writing.
Evidence overview
Start by checking whether the topic gives learners enough common ground and enough productive disagreement. A food waste discussion works well because most learners can talk about shopping, meals or leftovers, but they can still debate cost, access, farming, transport and climate. Give the class a small knowledge base first, such as two short facts or images, so the discussion is not built on guesswork.

Good listening activities help learners compare perspectives, not just take turns. Use questions that focus attention on one part of the subject matter, such as cause, evidence, fairness or method. Well-framed questions give learners a reason to listen because they must respond to the idea before adding their own view.
The Universal Thinking Framework comes with deep question stems that can be quickly used for creating listening tasks. As well as providing a stimulus for deep thinking, the higher-order questions stems can be used to assess English Listening.
Speaking and listening build language when learners recall, explain and improve subject vocabulary aloud. Vygotsky (1978) helps explain why guided talk matters: learners develop language through supported social activity. Karpicke (2008) adds a memory lens, because verbal brain dumps, partner quizzes and explanation prompts make learners practise retrieval rather than only rehearse performance. Treat the EEF's oral language evidence as a guide to likely impact, not a promise that every discussion task adds six months of progress (Education Endowment Foundation, 2021).
Choosing speaking and listening topics is easier when teachers start with the knowledge learners already have. Age-appropriate controversy can work, but it needs shared vocabulary and enough background knowledge for learners to argue from evidence, not guesswork. Children's news programmes, curriculum questions and local issues all work when the topic is concrete, safe to discuss and linked to the lesson goal.
Useful questions include 'Should we eat meat?', 'Do we need cars?' and 'What should we learn at school?' These questions work only when learners have the knowledge and vocabulary to justify a view. Drama can help because learners take roles, test perspectives and practise listening for evidence. Replace the vague idea of a 'listening grade' with a short checklist: paraphrases accurately, asks a follow-up question, cites evidence and invites another voice. For an immersive approach, explore Mantle of the Expert, a drama-based inquiry method.

Older or more confident learners should paraphrase precisely, using stems such as 'I hear you saying...' or 'In other words, you mean...'. This matters because strong listening is observable: the learner can restate another person's point before adding a reason, challenge or example.
Set expectations for talk before the activity starts. Give learners roles, sentence stems and a clear purpose. This means participation is not left to confidence.
Clear classroom rules make talk fair and focused: learners should build on previous points, disagree with reasons and show they have heard others. Older learners should use these routines across the curriculum. Whether they agree with the topic or not, they should be able to contribute evidence and respond to another viewpoint.
A strong topic teaches academic language within the subject, rather than treating oracy as a general skill. Christodoulou (2014) argues that thinking depends on stored knowledge, and this matters for talk as much as writing. In science, learners might use evaporation, variable and evidence before they explain an investigation. Classroom dialogue can be used as rehearsal for writing: learners try vocabulary aloud, hear other ways to phrase ideas and improve the sentence before it goes on paper.

id="">
To help get you started here is a series of example speaking and listening topics. These have been categorised to give a spread of approaches. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
For Younger Children:
For Older Children:
Controversial Topics:
Assess oracy with short, repeatable indicators, not long rubrics. Whole-school tracking should avoid talk tokens or grades for every contribution, as these often reward how often learners speak and how confident they sound, rather than the quality of their talk. Track one talk move at a time, such as paraphrasing, giving evidence or inviting another speaker. Audio snippets, peer checklists and brief teacher notes can show progress without creating a second marking workload (Mercer, 2000; Alexander, 2008).
Use indicators that show how learners think and interact. Do not judge accent, dialect or neurotypical body language (Cushing, 2020).
Oracy is both talk for learning and talk as performance. Exploratory talk helps learners test ideas, ask questions and build knowledge; presentational talk helps them shape ideas for an audience. The Oracy Education Commission (2024) argues that schools need a planned entitlement to both forms, not a few isolated speaking tasks.
Speaking and listening across subjects work best when teachers teach the knowledge, vocabulary and listening routines that learners need. These routines make discussion useful, not just busy. Learners should be able to explain a scientific claim, challenge a historical interpretation and give a reasoned view while solving problems with others (Mercer & Littleton, 2007).
Good speaking and listening topics should use a mix of formats and challenge levels, so all learners can take part. Discussion-based topics might include current affairs debates, age-appropriate moral dilemmas, or subject debates. For example, younger learners might discuss 'Should homework be banned?', while older learners might ask, 'Is social media beneficial for democracy?'
Learners engage when presentation topics connect with their interests and the curriculum. For Key Stage 2, try "Design your ideal school." Use "Historical figure spotlight" to support history learning.
Problem solving simulations also keep learners involved.
Research shows that collaborative tasks can improve speaking and listening (Gillies, 2003). Group work and peer teaching are useful because learners practise explaining ideas to others. Storytelling and book talks also support literacy. These activities build learner confidence (Mercer, 2000; Vygotsky, 1978).
For Key Stage 1, choose speaking topics carefully. Vygotsky (1978) is useful here because learners need supported talk that sits just beyond what they can already do alone. Use familiar themes such as family, toys, stories or classroom routines so they can draw on prior knowledge before trying new sentence forms. Add sentence stems, rehearsal time and partner support, then reduce the support as talk becomes more secure.
Key Stage 2 learners tackle more complex topics as their thinking grows. Topics include history, science and ethical issues, needing strong thinking skills. Alexander's (2020) dialogic teaching work shows carefully chosen topics spark debate. It pushes learners past recall to analysis.
Secondary education needs topics that stretch learners with complex ideas. These topics should also connect to their lives (Wigfield et al., 2004). Good topics can use current events, ethics and cross-curricular themes.
This helps learners connect knowledge across subjects (Bransford et al., 2000). Teachers need to offer intellectual challenge while also supporting learning (Vygotsky, 1978).
Classroom layout affects how learners speak and listen. Horseshoe shapes and small circles help learners engage (Mercer, 1995). Clear rules for turns are vital. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
This keeps talk flowing in a productive way.
Alexander (2020) highlights wait time and questioning to build oracy. Think-pair-share helps learners rehearse ideas before sharing aloud, reducing worry. Ground rules for listening encourage respect, making learners feel valued (Alexander, 2020).
Oracy needs clear behaviour strategies. Circulate as learners talk. This helps you support them, check engagement and avoid disruption (Mercer & Dawes, 2008). Set time limits, check in often and use movement or groups to keep participation high (Alexander, 2020).
Mercer (2000) shows that talk improves when the classroom has shared ground rules and a culture of respectful reasoning. Speaking anxiety often increases when learners fear public judgement, so teachers should model imperfect first attempts, praise specific talk moves and make preparation time visible.
Anxious learners often need low-pressure practice before speaking in public. Start with private planning, then move to pairs, and then to small-group talk. Voice-to-text tools and conversational AI can give EAL learners or socially anxious learners a private space to rehearse questions, try vocabulary and hear model responses before discussion with others, but teachers should check accuracy and privacy settings (Wan & Moorhouse, 2024). 'Think-pair-share' strategies also help (Lyman, 1981).
Give learners clear feedback that builds confidence. Focus on communication, not nerves. Point out progress in clarity, evidence, or engagement (Vygotsky, 1978). Use cross-year projects, community links, or recordings for real audiences, so learners see that communication has a purpose beyond grades (Willingham, 2009; Christodoulou, 2017; Dweck, 2006).
Free for teachers. The platform builds a classroom-ready lesson plan from your topic in under two minutes.
Oracy means being able to express yourself clearly and communicate well through spoken language. In school, learners learn to talk and learn through talk. This includes the physical, linguistic, cognitive, and social parts of communication that help learners succeed across the curriculum.
Teachers can start by establishing clear ground rules for talk to create a safe environment for discussion. Using structured sentence stems and question prompts from tools like the Universal Thinking Framework helps learners organise their thoughts. Regular opportunities for paired talk and group debates ensure that oracy becomes a consistent part of every lesson.
Strong speaking skills help learners make their thinking clearer. They also help learners understand difficult subjects more deeply. Speaking is an important step before writing, as learners can practise vocabulary and sentence structures aloud first. It also builds social confidence and prepares learners for the talk they will need in adult life.
Evidence suggests that high quality classroom talk is closely linked to better outcomes in English, maths, and science. Research from organisations like the Education Endowment Foundation shows that oral language interventions can add several months of progress. This approach is especially useful for narrowing the attainment gap for disadvantaged learners.
A common error is to assume that learners build oracy skills just because they are talking. Without clear structure and specific learning intentions, classroom talk can stay at surface level. Teachers also need to teach listening behaviour directly. Learners must understand how to hear others, not only how to speak.
Teachers can assess speaking and listening by watching group discussions and using a clear set of indicators. They might look at whether learners build on others' ideas, use academic vocabulary, or adapt their speech for different audiences. Short recordings of learner talk can also support feedback and individual reflection.
Oracy skills need planning within each subject (Alexander, 2005). Learners explain maths reasoning through discussions (Mercer, 1995). In science, learners discuss hypotheses (Vygotsky, 1978). History provides debates and role-play, letting learners explore views (Barnes, 1976).
Alexander (2020) says good classroom talk is collective, reciprocal, and purposeful. This turns subject tasks into oracy chances. Geography fieldwork builds learners' questioning and reporting. Art criticism helps learners explain judgements and give feedback.
Mapping curriculum content helps teachers see where speaking and listening can improve learning. They can use subject talk protocols, such as reasoning stems, to guide classroom talk (Mercer, 1995). This helps learners build communication skills alongside knowledge (Alexander, 2008). Peer assessment also strengthens oracy across subjects while meeting curriculum goals (Vygotsky, 1978).

Create a step-by-step oracy implementation plan for your key stage. Include talk protocols, sentence stems, and assessment checkpoints. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
Oracy research is strong enough to guide planning, but it should not be treated as a simple recipe. Vygotsky (1978) gives teachers a useful account of learning through guided social activity, yet the zone of proximal development is difficult to measure reliably in a busy classroom. Rogoff (2003) also warns that learning routines are culturally situated, so a discussion format that works in one classroom may not carry the same meaning for learners from different linguistic, family or community traditions.
A second critique is methodological. Toolkit averages from the Education Endowment Foundation (2021) combine varied oral language approaches, ages and outcomes, so headline progress figures should not be read as guarantees for any single class. Unstructured peer talk can also overload working memory when learners lack the vocabulary or background knowledge needed for the topic. Kirschner, Sweller and Clark (2006) argue that minimally guided tasks are weak for novice learners. This matters for oracy because talk without prior knowledge can become confident guessing.
A third limitation concerns assessment. Rubrics that reward eye contact, standard grammar or confident delivery can mistake middle-class, neurotypical behaviour for good thinking. Flores and Rosa (2015) critique appropriateness-based language expectations, while Cushing (2020) shows how standard language ideology can become language policing in English schools. Oracy assessment should therefore value reasoning, listening and evidence use, while allowing varied dialects, accents and participation routes.
Finally, Karpicke and Roediger (2008) support verbal recall tasks, but their evidence came mainly from controlled memory studies, not whole-class dialogue. The theory remains valuable when used carefully: it helps teachers design purposeful talk, but it needs cultural awareness, explicit knowledge teaching and modest claims about impact.
Karpicke, J. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
These studies provide deeper insights into speaking and listening activities and oracy in education.
Oracy: The Missing Link in School Improvement
Alexander, R. (2012)
Alexander (date) argues oracy is neglected, though vital for learning. Research shows structured talk boosts learners' achievement and social skills. Teachers should plan speaking and listening activities across all subjects to address this (Alexander, date).
Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk View study ↗ 1,336 citations
Alexander, R. (2008)
Alexander (2020) says dialogic teaching uses talk to boost learner thinking. Research (various dates) finds five kinds of classroom talk, from rote to dialogue. Real dialogue builds deeper understanding. Teachers should plan speaking tasks where learners reason and build on ideas.
Speaking, Listening, and Thinking: A Guide to Oracy Across the Curriculum
Mercer, N. and Hodgkinson, S. (2008)
Mercer and Hodgkinson offer a framework for oracy across the curriculum. It covers physical, linguistic, cognitive, and social-emotional skills. Research shows teaching talk skills improves discussion quality and learner confidence. Schools can plan oracy development from Reception to Year 13 using this.
The Voice 21 Oracy Framework 180 citations
Voice 21 (2019)
Voice 21's framework helps you develop oracy. It includes progression for speaking and listening. Research proves explicit oracy teaching improves reading and writing. It also enhances academic performance (Voice 21). Plan topics to build communication skills using this framework.
Exploratory Talk and Collaborative Reasoning View study ↗ 1 citations
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. and Dawes, L. (1999)
Mercer's (date not provided) Thinking Together research shows discussion rules help learners. Good discussions improve both talk quality and learners' reasoning scores. Exploratory talk, where learners share and build on ideas, boosts important thinking (Mercer, date not provided).
Surface misconceptions in 30 seconds. Print-ready prompts.