Personalised Learning: A teacher's guide

What is Personalised Learning?

Personalised learning is a teaching method that tailors instruction to the unique needs, interests, and strengths of each individual learner, enhancing learning outcomes across diverse student profiles. By focusing on each pupil's distinct traits, personalised learning environments offer a structured yet flexible pathway to support and challenge students in their educational journeys. The process does not require an increase in teacher workload or extensive extra planning. Instead, it encourages a balanced learning approach that aligns with classroom dynamics and individualised goals.

In this article, we explore how the Thinking Framework can be an invaluable tool for creating personalised learning journeys, allowing teachers to design responsive classroom activities that fit each student's specific needs. Through collaborative planning, the framework empowers educators to develop co-created learning plans, promoting student ownership and active involvement in their own progress. This approach, demonstrated successfully in partner schools, shows that personalised learning can effectively scaffold lower-attaining pupils while providing stretch opportunities for higher achievers, all within the same classroom.

Additionally, we discuss how the Thinking Framework enriches teaching practices by fostering adaptable, engaging strategies that align with the personalised goals of individual learners. This approach to lesson planning enables educators to create dynamic, inclusive learning environments, making personalised learning accessible, effective, and sustainable for all students.

‍

‍

What are the characteristics of a Personalised Learning Plan?

Personalised learning provides students with additional activities, which are a little different from a more traditional classroom. Following are the main characteristics of personalised learning:

• Lessons are created according to the interests of the students;
• Content, teaching style and goals of the lesson plans are geared toward the individual needs of each learner;
• Personalised approaches to student learning are highly collaborative, as students with similar learning styles or interests often work together in groups; which helps them to build great social, leadership and communication skills.
• A class teacher spends much less of his/ her class time delivering lectures to students inside the classroom and students have a choice of how to learn and what to learn;
• The pace of instruction is adjusted according to individual student: lessons are taught to suit the pace of student's learning;
• Personalised learning technologies are frequently used to accomplish the objectives of personalised learning.



What are the main benefits of using a personalised learning template?

Personalized learning strategies benefit both secondary and primary school teachers and students in the classroom. They offer customised learning experiences to learners to pursue their education at their own pace and allow educators to focus on support, guidance, and long-term planning. Below are some of the top advantages of  personalisation of learning in the classroom:

1. Improved Academic Performance: Possibly the most important benefit of implementing personalised learning in a classroom is that it improves educational success rates. Personalised learning improves the relationships between students and secondary and primary school teachers. Also, it allows students to pursue their interests and gain an education at their own pace. Consequently, students' classroom performance is noticeably improved. Research shows that when schools switch from traditional to personalised learning, their student's standardised test scores were greatly improved within 2 years.

2. Helps Improve Soft Skills: Personalised learning also involves essential skill-building. It focuses on creating and practising soft skills such as empathy, communication, collaboration and creativity. Soft skills are important as learners prepare for an uncertain professional life. No one knows how commonly-used tech will change the job market in the upcoming decades. But, it is predicted that by 2039, nearly 30% of the global work will be automated. And soft skills will remain high in demand in an era of increased automation. Hence, personalised learning makes individuals ready to survive in an uncertain future job market.

3. Master in School Subjects: When students are taught by a strategy that is best suited to their learning style and when students can work at their own pace, they master each topic on the curriculum. Students of a traditional classroom are taught each subject at a specific pace, which may leave some learners behind and some faster learners may become disinterested. Personalised learning enables each student to learn a lesson at their preferred pace, which allows them to properly understand the lesson and eventually master the lesson.

4. Encourages Collaboration: A classroom with personalised learning opportunities provides an ideal learning environment nurturing a high level of collaboration. A class teacher and students work together to set goals and learning plans to meet the needs of the learner and the requirements of the educational curriculum. Personalised learning improves collaboration skills as learners are encouraged to work in collaboration with their peers and learn together and share information by way of group assignments and informal knowledge sharing.

5. Improved Student Feedback: A personalised learning experience frequently involves easy access to Tech. The use of technology allows students to build self-advocacy skills and enables a class teacher to provide sooner and more frequent feedback to their students. Therefore, teachers, parents and students can sooner and better understand how well a learner has understood a new lesson and they can deal with any knowledge gaps as soon as possible

6. Educators can use their Class Time more Effectively: The personalised school approach involves the use of personalised learning technologies, which supports educators in spending less time on administrative tasks and allows them to spend more time in the delivery of quality learning and supporting students in achieving their potential. Online learning strategies help educators to reduce marking time. Personalised learning involves less classroom lecturing, which allows teachers to focus on providing one-on-one help to the students. Using an App for parents will help schools in parent consultation. These Apps enable termly parent consultations and enable parents to find out how their kids are performing in school. From seeing their children's current assignments to accessing the pupil report of assessment for learning purposes, parents can remain updated about their children's academic performance, without causing any added burden on teachers.

‍

‍



What are the common barriers to personalised learning?

One of the main reasons why the personalised school approach is not implemented well in every classroom is because it takes more time to properly follow personalised learning paths. Using the most easily accessible learning strategies and online platforms such as School Portals and Learning Management Systems (LMS) it is possible to remove the barriers that may prevent the primary or secondary schools classroom from becoming personalised. Some biggest challenges of implementing practical strategies of a personalised approach to teaching are:

• Gaining a balance between competency-based procedures and fulfilling grade-level academic standards;
• Difficulties in data-informed learning within the school's IT systems;
• Lack of effective teaching strategies training and familiarity with differentiated instruction and executing personalised and flexible learning plans.
• Teachers' busy schedules or lack of time available to develop and apply personalised learning plans to suit the needs of students.

In personalised learning, the instructional approach and pace of learning are optimised by the needs of each pupil. Instructional content, instructional approaches, and learning objectives, all are customised based on individual learner needs. Also, learning activities are often self-initiated and relevant to students, driven by their interests. However, personalised learning is still in its initial stages. Schools need to do a lot more to ensure that the students are provided with a wide range of learning paths, customized learning experiences and additional learning opportunities that allow them to achieve their potential.

‍

‍



‍

 

‍

‍

Moving a personalised learning agenda forward in your school

If your school is moving in the direction of customised classroom activities then we would advise you to have a look at the framework and think about how you could use it to design sequences of learning and assessments. We know that digital skills and analytical skills are critical for our current cohort of students. Using the framework, you can create assessments that dig deeper into critical thinking skills and go beyond multiple choice answers. Technology-enabled teaching has come a long way in recent years but this alone won't be the answer. Education systems need to rethink their philosophy around classroom instruction.

Thinking more deeply about the delivery of content is a good starting point. Pupils enjoy collaborative activities that stretch their abilities. A 'one size fits all' approach using downloaded worksheets might not be the answer. The framework allows educators to think about content delivery in a very different way. Simply having the learning actions in your desk drawer gives frontline educators opportunities to take learning in different directions for different pupils. Personalisation does not necessarily mean reinventing the wheel, it's more about creating different pathways to the end destination.

‍

‍



Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly is personalised learning and how does it differ from traditional teaching methods?

Personalised learning is a teaching method that tailors instruction to each student's unique needs, interests, and strengths, moving beyond the one-size-fits-all approach. Unlike traditional methods where all students learn at the same pace through lectures, personalised learning allows students choice in how and what they learn, with content and teaching styles adapted to individual requirements. Teachers spend less time delivering whole-class lectures and more time providing targeted support and guidance.

How can teachers implement personalised learning without increasing their workload or planning time?

The Thinking Framework enables teachers to create personalised learning without extensive extra planning by providing a structured yet flexible approach to responsive classroom activities. Teachers can use personalised learning technologies to reduce administrative tasks and marking time, allowing them to focus on meaningful one-to-one support. The framework encourages collaborative planning where students co-create their learning plans, which actually reduces teacher burden whilst increasing student ownership.

What are the main characteristics that define a personalised learning classroom?

Personalised learning classrooms feature lessons created according to student interests, with content and teaching styles tailored to individual needs and learning paces. Students work collaboratively in groups with similar learning styles, building social and communication skills whilst having choice in their learning methods. Technology is frequently integrated to support learning objectives, and teachers act more as facilitators and guides rather than traditional lecturers.

What proven benefits can schools expect when switching to personalised learning approaches?

Research shows that schools switching to personalised learning see greatly improved standardised test scores within two years, alongside enhanced academic performance due to students learning at their own pace. Students develop crucial soft skills like empathy, collaboration, and creativity, which are essential for the future job market where 30% of work may be automated by 2039. Additionally, students achieve better mastery of subjects and demonstrate increased engagement and ownership of their learning.

How does personalised learning help both high-achieving and struggling students in the same classroom?

Personalised learning effectively scaffolds lower-attaining pupils by allowing them to work at their own pace and receive targeted support, ensuring no one gets left behind. Simultaneously, it provides stretch opportunities for higher achievers who might otherwise become disinterested in traditional whole-class teaching. This dual approach means all students can master curriculum topics properly, as they're not constrained by a fixed pace that may be too fast or too slow for their individual needs.

What role does technology play in making personalised learning manageable for teachers?

Technology in personalised learning reduces administrative burden by streamlining marking, providing automated feedback, and enabling easier progress tracking for individual students. It facilitates more frequent and timely feedback between teachers, students, and parents through apps and digital platforms. This technological support frees up teachers to focus on high-value activities like one-to-one support and collaborative planning rather than administrative tasks.

What are the main barriers teachers face when trying to implement personalised learning?

The primary barrier to implementing personalised learning is the perception that it requires significantly more time to properly follow personalised learning paths for each student. Many educators worry about the complexity of managing different learning approaches simultaneously and the planning required for individualised instruction. However, the article suggests that with the right framework and technology, these time concerns can be addressed without increasing overall workload.

Further Reading on Personalised Learning

Research consistently demonstrates that personalized and adaptive classroom activities, across interest-based learning, literacy-focused interventions, and self-directed approaches, have a positive impact on student performance, engagement, and skill development in diverse educational settings.

1. Adaptive Learning and Student Interest: Walkington (2013) investigated adaptive learning technology in a secondary mathematics setting, finding that personalized algebra problems based on students' interests enhanced problem-solving accuracy and speed. This study supports the use of adaptive learning platforms to boost student engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105, pp. 932-945.
2. Individualized Literacy Instruction: Connor et al. (2009) examined individualized literacy instruction among first graders, showing that tailoring instruction to each student's literacy skills promoted stronger literacy growth. The findings emphasize the importance of Child x Instruction interactions in fostering literacy development. Child Development, Vol. 80, pp. 77-100.
3. Self-Directed Learning for Gifted Students: Betts and Neihart (1986) explored self-directed learning models for gifted students, noting that individualized approaches enhance students' attitudes, self-concepts, and learning efficacy. This study highlights the positive outcomes of adapting instruction for cognitive growth and engagement. Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp. 174-177.
4. Individualized Support in Literacy and Self-Regulation: Connor et al. (2010) found that first graders with initially weaker self-regulation skills showed greater improvement when receiving individualized literacy instruction, linking personalized learning with self-regulation development and academic growth. Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 433-455.
5. Personalized Instruction in ESL: Henry (1975) investigated individualized instruction within an English as a Second Language (ESL) setting, finding that individualized learning approaches significantly improved language acquisition by centering the learning process on the student experience. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 9, pp. 31.