Dialogic Teaching: A classroom guide for better thinking and talking

What is dialogic teaching?

Dialogic teaching is an approach that places meaningful dialogue at the heart of the learning process. Rather than viewing talk as a simple means of delivering information, dialogic education treats conversation as a powerful tool for cognitive development. By fostering student interactions and encouraging multiple perspectives, this approach helps learners construct knowledge together rather than passively receiving it.

Developed from the work of the Cambridge Educational Dialogue Research Group and rooted in social learning theory, dialogic pedagogy emphasizes the importance of structured classroom discussions. It moves beyond traditional teacher-led instruction by incorporating exploratory talk, where students actively question, reason, and reflect in collaboration with their peers. Research from organizations like the Education Endowment Foundation highlights the positive effects of dialogic practices on student engagement, critical thinking, and long-term learning outcomes.

Dialogic teaching requires intentional design. Teachers create learning practices that support open-ended questioning, encourage challenge and reasoning, and ensure all voices are heard. Various forms of classroom talk—such as debate, peer discussion, and guided reasoning—help develop students' oracy skills, giving them the confidence to articulate ideas and build upon the thoughts of others. This process strengthens not just knowledge acquisition but also critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.

By embedding talk-based learning into daily instruction, educators create dynamic, responsive environments where students learn not only from their teachers but also from each other. This approach supports deeper comprehension, fosters independence, and equips learners with essential communication skills for the future.

Key Takeaways:

• Dialogue enhances learning – Engaging in meaningful discussions helps students develop reasoning, articulation, and problem-solving skills.
• Exploratory talk builds understanding – Encouraging students to question, challenge, and refine their thinking leads to deeper cognitive development.
• Structured classroom talk improves outcomes – Thoughtfully designed dialogic practices support critical thinking, engagement, and long-term retention. 

‍

‍

‍

What are the Origins of Dialogic Teaching?

While the term dialogic teaching was formally developed by Robin Alexander in the early 2000s, its roots can be traced back to ancient Socratic questioning. Socrates believed that education should not be about delivering fixed knowledge but rather about eliciting new thinking through thoughtful questioning. His method involved teachers and students engaging in open-ended dialogue where neither party knew the final answer in advance. This approach emphasized the process of learning over simply arriving at a correct answer.

Building on these principles, Lev Vygotsky, a key figure in developmental psychology, explored the connection between language and cognition. He argued that learning is fundamentally a social process, where children construct knowledge through interaction with more knowledgeable others. His theory of cognitive scaffolding highlighted how children benefit from rich learning environments where dialogue plays a central role in deepening understanding and extending prior knowledge. Vygotsky’s work linked language development with higher-order thinking skills, reinforcing the idea that conversation fosters intellectual growth.

Later, Mikhail Bakhtin, a Russian philosopher, introduced the concept of dialogism, which emphasized that meaning is shaped through interaction. His work inspired modern dialogic pedagogy, suggesting that learning is an ongoing exchange of ideas rather than a one-way transmission of knowledge.

Drawing from these historical foundations, Robin Alexander developed dialogic teaching, a structured approach that prioritizes purposeful classroom talk. His research emphasized that dialogue should not be left to chance; rather, it must be carefully planned and scaffolded to ensure deep thinking, reasoning, and engagement. Dialogic teaching positions conversation as a tool for learner autonomy, helping students take ownership of their learning through structured questioning and discussion.

‍

‍

Key Influences on Dialogic Teaching

• Socrates (470–399 BCE) – Developed Socratic questioning, encouraging open-ended discussion to stimulate deeper thinking rather than assessing fixed knowledge.
• Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934) – Introduced cognitive scaffolding, emphasizing the role of social interaction and language in learning.
• Mikhail Bakhtin (1895–1975) – Explored dialogism, highlighting the importance of meaning-making through interactive dialogue.
• Robin Alexander (2000s–present) – Formalized dialogic teaching, advocating for structured, purposeful talk in classrooms to enhance learning outcomes.

By integrating these foundational theories, dialogic pedagogy continues to evolve, reinforcing the power of talk-based learning in shaping student understanding and fostering a culture of critical thinking and collaboration.

‍

‍

Fostering Critical Thinking Through Dialogic Teaching

Dialogic teaching creates a learning environment where ideas, perspectives, and questions are woven together to encourage deep thinking. Based on the work of Robin Alexander, this approach has been shown to enhance critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills, ultimately leading to improved academic outcomes.

Integrating dialogic teaching into classroom practice offers multiple benefits:

• Promotes active student participation – Encourages ownership of learning and engagement in discussions.
• Develops critical thinking skills – Challenges students to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information through meaningful dialogue.
• Enhances communication skills – Helps students articulate thoughts clearly and engage in structured discussion.
• Fosters a positive learning environment – Creates a classroom culture where curiosity and intellectual exploration are valued.
• Encourages collaboration – Builds a sense of community as students learn from each other.

Research from Alexander, Barnes, and Todd (1995) highlights how structured talk enhances learning outcomes and helps students develop reasoning skills. By prioritizing dialogue as a core learning tool, educators can create classrooms that encourage exploration, debate, and deeper engagement with content.

‍

‍

‍

Dialogic Teaching Strategies

Dialogic teaching strategies provide structured opportunities for students to express themselves, fostering both academic and social growth. Rooted in sociocultural and child development theories, these approaches help students engage more meaningfully in the learning process. Educators can implement the following strategies to cultivate student voice and participation:

• Use open-ended questioning – Encourages higher-order thinking and deeper discussion.
• Apply Think-Pair-Share activities – Provides time for students to process ideas, discuss with a peer, and share with the class.
• Facilitate Socratic seminars – Supports critical thinking and collaborative inquiry through structured group discussions.
• Incorporate role-playing – Encourages students to explore diverse perspectives and develop empathy.
• Create reflective spaces – Provides a safe environment for students to express their thoughts without fear of judgment.

Research by Lyle (2008) and Resnick et al. (2015) highlights the connection between oracy and student outcomes, emphasizing the importance of dialogic strategies in academic success and social development. By embedding meaningful classroom dialogue, teachers equip students with essential communication skills that extend far beyond the classroom.

‍

‍

What are the five key principles of dialogic talk?

Dialogic teaching strategies create a rich and engaging learning experience that promotes student voice and participation. At the core of this approach is the use of dialogue during classroom teaching, which fosters an environment that nurtures the development of critical thinking and collaboration. Drawing upon evidence from classroom practice, we can distill five key principles of dialogic talk:

1. Collective: Engaging students in a shared learning experience, where knowledge is co-constructed through dialogue and collaboration.
2. Reciprocal: Encouraging the free exchange of ideas, where students listen to one another, question, and respond thoughtfully.
3. Supportive: Creating a safe and inclusive environment, enabling students to express their thoughts and opinions without fear of judgment.
4. Cumulative: Building on prior knowledge and understanding, allowing students to develop a deeper comprehension of the subject matter.
5. Purposeful: Ensuring that classroom discussions are focused and meaningful, with clear learning objectives in mind.

The research conducted by Alexander (2006) and Mercer and Dawes (2014) highlights the significant impact of dialogic teaching strategies on oracy and student outcomes. By fostering learning practices that emphasize the value of dialogue and interaction, educators can create environments in which children thrive, developing the skills and confidence needed for success in today's interconnected world.

‍

‍

‍

By adhering to these key principles in the classroom, students will not only increase understanding of their prior knowledge but also cultivate a sense of curiosity and ownership over their learning journey.

Jerome Bruner, a prominent theorist in the realm of dialogic talk, posits that culture, rather than biology, shapes human life and the human mind. Bruner builds on Vygotsky's notion that most learning in most settings is a communal activity, emphasizing the importance of social interactions in shaping our understanding of the world.

Bruner's research underscores the vital role of positive classroom cultures in fostering effective learning experiences (Bruner, 1996). He suggests that educators have often underestimated children's innate predispositions for particular kinds of interactions, and by understanding the types of interactions that resonate with children, teachers can create more engaging and meaningful learning environments.

Furthermore, Noddings (2005) highlights the importance of fostering a caring and supportive classroom culture, where students feel valued and understood.

To captivate students' interests and facilitate deeper learning, educators must provide context and purpose for the learning material, employing stories, images, metaphors, and analogies to make abstract concepts more accessible.

In addition, it is crucial to create opportunities for students to practice using language appropriately, as this fosters the development of effective communication skills and promotes a greater understanding of the subject matter. By integrating these principles into their teaching practices, educators can nurture a positive classroom culture that empowers students to thrive academically and socially.

‍

What are the benefits of dialogic teaching?

The benefits of dialogic pedagogy can be seen in its other uses. In business, it enhances employee and customer communication, and in politics it builds constituency. As the science behind dialogic pedagogy has come to light, many schools and organisations have adopted it. We recommend that schools use it to further develop their students. Tata Power Group developed a school in Mumbai where dialogic pedagogy has been integrated into the curriculum.

They observe a daily 20 minute break and allow students to discuss in a group. What impact does dialogic pedagogy have on attainment?

The education endowment foundation (EEF),conducted a trial researching into the impact the cognitively challenging classroom talk can lead to gains for pupils. For English, Maths and Science, they found a positive impact in English for all children in year 5. It concluded the dialogic teaching made two additional months progress in English and science.

In another study conducted by EEF, they looked at how much time was spent talking about topics such as history, geography, maths and science. They compared three groups: one which had no formal instruction; one who received traditional teacher-led lessons; and one who received an interactive lesson plan. They found that those who were taught via the interactive method achieved higher levels than both the control group and the traditional group.

‍

‍

‍

How should I implement Dialogic Teaching?

There are several ways you could introduce dialogic pedagogy into your class room. The best way would be to start with small steps. You may wish to try out some of the activities suggested below and use them as the basis of starting your own dialogic teaching project.

1) Start off by asking questions. Ask open ended questions. These help build up conversation. When you ask a question, wait for someone else to answer before moving onto the next topic.

2) Use visual aids. Visual aids can include pictures or diagrams.

3) Provide multiple choice options.

4) Allow students to take turns speaking.

5) Have students write down key points from each person’s contribution.

6) Encourage students to share opinions and experiences.

7) Give feedback after every turn.

8) Make sure there is enough silence between speakers.

9) Don't interrupt when people speak.

10) Be prepared to listen carefully.

11) Let everyone finish speaking. 

‍

‍

‍

Embracing a dialogic learning environment

There are numerous guidelines relating to this pedagogical approach but they shouldn't be seen as straitjackets. Provide teaching staff with the principles and some underlying resources such as a dialogic teaching framework. Afford teachers the opportunity to take educational theory and use it in their own classroom practice. If the concept becomes a tick box exercise implemented by a well-meaning management team then the classroom teacher can easily become demotivated.

Maintaining professional integrity in the teaching profession requires us to trust the classroom practitioner to make decisions about their own scaffolding approach. They may facilitate collaborative learning differently from you or me. As long as the concept has been embraced and the learning process has been enhanced particularly for low-achieving students, we should trust classroom teachers to make their own decisions. Dialogic discourse comes in all sorts of form, if it is announcing student interaction and critical thinking then it's probably working.

We have been trying to systematically increase levels of thinking by increasing the complexity of student thinking. Using the Universal Thinking Framework, we can carefully guide dialogic discourse along with the critical thinking that accompanies it. By carefully taking a student through a certain cognitive route we can positively effect their discourse about the content. The collaborative learning that entails has a positive impact on both the classroom talk and the cognitive development of the student.

This dialogic learning gets to the very essence of what Vygotsky theorised. Scaffolding approaches like this means that we can support the learning process for all of our students.

‍

‍

‍

Creating dialogic teaching guidelines

The following principles outline what makes up an effective dialogue between teachers and students. They have been developed from research into successful schools where there was a high degree of student participation in learning activities. The principles also reflect the views of many practitioners working with young people today.

1) Students' voices matter - they must be heard by everyone involved in the lesson. This means not only listening to them but actively engaging with their ideas and opinions. Teachers need to make it clear that they value this input. The levels of engagement need to be strong even among self-declared introverts. 

2) Everyone's voice counts - if we want our learners to feel valued then we must ensure that everyone gets a chance to contribute. We cannot assume that just because somebody speaks first that they will get more airtime. If we do so, we risk creating hierarchies within classrooms based upon power rather than ability.

3) All contributions count equally - even though some might seem less important than others, all contributions still add something valuable to the discussion. This type of democratic engagement builds the foundations of a truly dialogic classroom.

4) Every idea has its place - don't let anyone dominate the debate. There needs to be space for different perspectives on any given issue. Classroom interactions can harvest some new and interesting perspectives. 

5) No one knows everything - nobody has all the answers. Instead, we should encourage pupils to think critically about issues and challenge assumptions. This will help raise the quality of classroom talk and raise the levels of thinking. 

‍

‍

‍

Embracing Dialogic Pedagogy

Before we move on to criticisms of dialogic talk, let's briefly touch on how you can assess a structured classroom discussion as it may be difficult to grasp exactly what the students understand from the questions. The first way to assess understanding is through active participation. If a student is participating more than others, you can assume they have a better understanding although this is not always the case. Let's move on to the criticisms of dialogic talk.

Another problem with the theory is that the teachers voice is the guiding source in the lesson however, many teachers lack the tools necessary for planning effective whole class dialogues. Dialogic talk must be structured and implemented effectively to have an impact.

It requires time and effort which are often lacking in teacher education programs. In addition, it takes practice and experience to become proficient at using these techniques. Finally, it is very easy to fall back onto old habits when teaching. As such, I would suggest that teachers who wish to use dialogic methods should start small and work towards implementing larger scale lessons.                     

To conclude, when students are given the opportunity to form their own opinions and share their thoughts about a topic, they will have a better understanding of the subject. The power of classroom talk also extends to the development of good language skills as they engage in spoken and written discussion. By developing vocabulary and engaging in effective conversations, students will become more able to use their minds to comprehend and recall information. 

‍

Further Reading on Dialogic Learning

Robin Alexander is Fellow of Wolfson College at the University of Cambridge and Professor of Education Emeritus at the University of Warwick. He has published widely including books , articles and chapters in edited volumes. His research interests include critical pedagogy, social justice issues in schools, literacy and writing instruction, and curriculum design. 

Philosophy for Children (p4c) is a wonderful way of bringing teachers and children together to discuss things that matter. It has many benefits for both groups. He has published widely including books, articles and chapters in edited volumes. For example, it helps develop empathy by encouraging participants to consider other people’s points of view. It encourages children to express themselves freely without fear of being judged or ridiculed. And finally, it provides opportunities for children to learn new words and phrases. 

The following studies collectively highlight the significance of dialogic teaching and learning in enhancing academic outcomes, fostering effective classroom dialogue, and contributing to the social development of students across educational levels.

1. Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning by Rocío García-Carrión, Garazi López de Aguileta, M. Padrós, Mimar Ramis-Salas (2020): This review discusses the social impact of dialogic teaching and learning, emphasizing its role in improving academic attainment and social cohesion. It highlights the communicative methods approach as crucial for achieving social impact, despite challenges like maintaining monologic discourse by teachers.
2. Designing pedagogic strategies for dialogic learning in higher education by Alyson Simpson (2016): This article explores the use of dialogue to strengthen pre-service teachers’ reflective practices and knowledge about the power of talk for learning. It reports positive impacts of dialogue on students' learning experiences in higher education, recommending iterative exchanges across blended learning contexts.
3. The Dialogic Turn in Educational Psychology by Sandra Racionero, M. Padrós (2010): Presenting the shift towards dialogue in educational psychology, this article emphasizes culture, interaction, and dialogue as key factors in learning, aligning with the dialogic approach. It reviews how dialogic education aligns with successful practices in Europe, highlighting the move from internalist perspectives to focusing on communication and intersubjectivity.
4. Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching by Alina Reznitskaya, M. Gregory (2013): This paper proposes a theory of change for dialogic teaching, identifying epistemological understanding, argument skills, and disciplinary knowledge as learning outcomes. It reviews empirical research related to dialogic teaching, suggesting how dialogic classrooms influence students' development.
5. Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom by N. Mercer, Lyn Dawes, J. K. Staarman (2009): Using primary school science lessons as examples, this paper examines if teachers use dialogue to guide children's understanding development. It discusses how dialogue is used as a pedagogic tool and its educational value in promoting effective use of talk for learning.

‍