The Frayer Model: Build Deeper Vocabulary Understanding

Examples (This IS the concept)	Non-Examples (This is NOT)
A four-square graphic organiser with a word in the centre and sections for definition, characteristics, examples, and non-examples	A simple flashcard with just a word and its definition
Students analysing the word "democracy" by listing its definition, key features like voting rights, examples like the USA, and non-examples like dictatorships	Students copying dictionary definitions into their notebooks without analysis
A digital template where students explore "photosynthesis" through its definition, characteristics (requires sunlight), examples (plants making food), and non-examples (animals eating)	A word web or mind map showing only related words without structured analysis
A classroom activity where students complete Frayer Model charts for vocabulary words like "metaphor" before writing poetry	A vocabulary quiz that only tests memorization of definitions

For teachers, this method serves to and clarify unfamiliar vocabulary. It moves beyond rote learning and dictionary definitions, encouraging students to think critically about the words and terms they're learning. By breaking down understanding into digestible parts, the Frayer Model helps students not only remember terms but also understand their application and relevance.

Throughout this article, we'll explore the who, what, where, and why of the Frayer Model. We'll provide practical classroom examples and discuss its historical development. The aim is to equip educators with a thorough grasp of how this strategy can enhance

‍

‍

Who Developed the Frayer Model?

The Frayer Model was created in 1969 by Dorothy Frayer and her colleagues at the Wisconsin Centre for Education Research. Their main purpose was to help students meet academic vocabulary demands and learn difficult vocabulary more effectively. Dorothy and her team designed the model to support understanding of key vocabulary through explicit instructionand comprehensive word analysis.

Elements of vocabulary instruction such as structure, context, and metaphor are all part of the Frayer Model. It promotes effective word learning through scaffolding, meaning students receive guided practise as they move from a narrow understanding to full mastery. The model also applies to develop deep understanding, encouraging reflective inquiry and creativity.

This is considered a powerful tool for instructing subject-area vocabulary and crucial concepts. The Frayer Model encourages students to learn through concrete examples, allowing them to construct their own understandings so the information can be applied to everyday life. It works for any situation.

If you're interested in using more graphical methods for teaching vocabulary and developing deeper understanding, you can explore the various organisers available in our repository. As well as providing a scaffold for students to learn with, they can serve as a springboard towards clearer and writing.

‍

‍

Concept Attainment Theory: The Research Foundation

The Frayer Model draws directly from concept attainment theory, a framework formalised by Bruner, Goodnow and Austin (1956) in their landmark study A Study of Thinking. Bruner and colleagues demonstrated that learners acquire new concepts most reliably not by memorising definitions but by examining confirmed examples, rejected non-examples, and identifying the essential attributes that distinguish one category from another. Dorothy Frayer and her team at the Wisconsin Centre for Education Research (1969) applied this insight to vocabulary instruction, structuring the four-quadrant organiser so that each cell maps onto a distinct stage of concept attainment: definition (what the concept means), characteristics (its essential attributes), examples (confirmed instances), and non-examples (near-misses that test the boundary).

The non-examples quadrant is particularly significant from a concept attainment perspective. Tennyson and Park (1980) demonstrated in controlled studies that learners who encounter carefully chosen non-examples (items that share several attributes with the target concept but fall just outside its boundary) develop more precise and durable conceptual representations than those who study examples alone. In practice, a teacher asking Year 8 pupils to complete a Frayer Model for "democracy" would encourage them to list "oligarchy" or "benevolent dictatorship" as non-examples precisely because these near-misses force pupils to articulate where the boundary lies. This process of boundary-setting is the cognitive mechanism that the Frayer Model is designed to activate, and it distinguishes the tool from simpler vocabulary activities such as copying definitions from a dictionary.

Klausmeier (1985) extended concept attainment research by identifying four hierarchical levels of concept learning (concrete, identity, classificatory, and formal) and argued that classroom instruction rarely pushes pupils beyond the classificatory level. The Frayer Model's requirement to articulate essential characteristics and generate novel examples and non-examples corresponds to Klausmeier's formal level, the point at which a learner can evaluate an unfamiliar instance and correctly place it within or outside the concept category. Teachers who understand this theoretical basis are better placed to pitch the complexity of Frayer examples appropriately: younger or lower-attaining pupils may begin with concrete, perceptual examples, while more advanced learners should be challenged with abstract or counter-intuitive cases that genuinely test conceptual boundaries.

Marzano's Six-Step Vocabulary Model and Where the Frayer Fits

The most influential framework for vocabulary instruction in contemporary education research is Marzano's (2004) six-step model, set out in Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement. Marzano synthesised findings from hundreds of studies to argue that effective vocabulary instruction requires six steps: providing a description or explanation (not just a definition), restating the term in the learner's own words, creating a non-linguistic representation, engaging in activities to add to or refine understanding, discussing the word with peers, and playing games that reinforce understanding. The Frayer Model addresses steps one through four within a single structured task and, when completed collaboratively, incorporates step five as well. This alignment explains why the Frayer Model remains one of the most recommended vocabulary tools in schools that have adopted Marzano's instructional framework.

Marzano and Pickering (2005) reported an effect size of 0.74 for vocabulary instruction that combined linguistic and non-linguistic representations, roughly equivalent to nearly two terms' additional progress, compared to an effect size of 0.22 for instruction relying on linguistic exposure alone. The Frayer Model's characteristics and examples quadrants serve as the non-linguistic anchor, converting an abstract definition into a set of concrete, memorable associations. Beck, McKeown and Kucan (2013) reinforced this finding in their influential text Bringing Words to Life, distinguishing Tier 2 academic vocabulary (cross-disciplinary terms such as "analyse", "justify", or "equivalent") from Tier 3 subject-specific terms, and recommending structured graphic organisers like the Frayer Model as the appropriate instructional vehicle for Tier 2 vocabulary because these words lack the contextual richness that helps learners infer meaning from text alone.

Buehl (2009), in Classroom Strategies for Interactive Learning, describes the Frayer Model as one of a small number of vocabulary strategies with sufficient research backing to warrant routine use across subjects. Buehl notes that the model is particularly powerful as a formative assessment tool: a teacher who collects completed Frayer Models before a unit assessment can identify within minutes which pupils have confused essential with non-essential attributes, which have generated only superficial examples, and which have articulated genuinely sophisticated conceptual boundaries. This diagnostic function (identifying the quality of a pupil's conceptual representation rather than simply whether they can recall a definition) is what makes the Frayer Model a more instructionally rich choice than a vocabulary test or a matching exercise.

Subject-Specific Adaptations: Maths, Science, and EAL Learners

The standard four-quadrant Frayer Model (definition / characteristics / examples / non-examples) works well for vocabulary-rich subjects such as English and humanities, but teachers in mathematics and science often adapt the quadrant labels to better serve conceptual learning in those disciplines. A widely used mathematics adaptation replaces "characteristics" with "essential attributes" and "non-examples" with "common misconceptions", helping pupils distinguish properties that must be present (a rectangle must have four right angles) from properties that are often assumed but not essential (a rectangle does not have to be longer than it is wide). This adaptation was documented by Barton and Heidema (2002) in their review of content-area literacy strategies, who found that reframing the non-examples quadrant as "what it is NOT" helped secondary mathematics pupils correct persistent procedural misconceptions about concepts such as prime numbers, negative numbers, and probability.

In science education, the Frayer Model is frequently adapted to include a fifth element: a labelled diagram or visual representation, either by extending one quadrant or by adding a central image to the oval alongside the term. This modification reflects the centrality of visual-spatial reasoning in science concept learning and aligns with Paivio's (1986) dual coding theory, which predicts that information encoded both verbally and visually is recalled more reliably than information encoded in one modality alone. A secondary biology teacher might ask pupils to sketch the cell structure alongside the written definition of "osmosis", ensuring that the linguistic and spatial representations are constructed simultaneously rather than separately, which research suggests produces stronger integration of the two representations in long-term memory.

For pupils learning English as an Additional Language (EAL), a straightforward and well-evidenced adaptation is to permit the definition or characteristics quadrant to be completed initially in the learner's first language, with a target-language translation added alongside. Cummins (2001), in Negotiating Identities, argues that building on a pupil's existing conceptual knowledge in the first language is not a crutch but a scaffold: if a pupil already has a well-formed concept of "photosynthesis" in Polish or Urdu, requiring them to re-construct that concept from scratch in English wastes the existing knowledge and slows vocabulary acquisition unnecessarily. A bilingual Frayer Model, where the pupil writes the definition in both languages, confirms that the conceptual understanding is secure and then shifts instructional effort to the vocabulary-form mapping rather than concept formation. Teachers working with newly arrived EAL pupils report that this approach significantly reduces the cognitive load of subject lessons, allowing pupils to demonstrate subject knowledge while simultaneously acquiring academic English.

Frayer Model Compared to Other Vocabulary Strategies

Teachers choosing a vocabulary strategy should understand what each tool does well and where its limitations lie. The Frayer Model occupies a specific niche: it is most effective for teaching conceptual or abstract vocabulary where the boundary between the target concept and related concepts is the key learning objective. When pupils need to distinguish "simile" from "metaphor", or "speed" from "velocity", the non-examples quadrant does pedagogical work that no other common vocabulary tool achieves as systematically. For high-frequency sight words or subject-specific labels with narrow definitions (the name of a country, the symbol for an element), the Frayer Model's four-quadrant structure may be disproportionate in time and cognitive demand.

Semantic mapping, developed by Johnson and Pearson (1984), is a closer competitor. Both tools ask pupils to consider a word's relationships and associations, but semantic maps are non-hierarchical and open-ended: pupils generate any associated words and arrange them spatially, with lines showing relationships. This approach develops richer associative networks and works well for exploring broad themes or prior knowledge. The Frayer Model, by contrast, imposes a fixed structure, which is a strength when teachers want all pupils to address the same cognitive tasks (definition, boundary, example, non-example) and a limitation when open-ended exploration is the goal. Research by Pittelman, Heimlich, Berglund and French (1991) found semantic mapping more effective for activating prior knowledge at the start of a unit, while structured graphic organisers like the Frayer Model showed stronger results for post-instruction vocabulary consolidation.

Concept circles, introduced by Wandberg and Rohwer (2010), ask pupils to place related terms in a divided circle and justify how each relates to a central concept. This tool is more dialogic than the Frayer Model and lends itself to group discussion and annotation, but it does not systematically require non-examples or formal definitions. Word walls, by contrast, provide passive environmental exposure to vocabulary and serve a different function: maintaining salience of key terms over time, rather than building the kind of deep conceptual understanding the Frayer Model targets. A well-designed vocabulary curriculum will use the Frayer Model alongside these complementary strategies rather than as a replacement: semantic mapping to activate prior knowledge, the Frayer Model to build precise conceptual understanding, and word walls to sustain exposure across a unit.

Key Features of Frayer Model Framework

The Frayer Model features a four-square graphic organiser with the target word in the centre, surrounded by sections for definition, characteristics, examples, and non-examples. This visual structure helps students analyse vocabulary from multiple angles rather than simply memorizing definitions. The model promotes deep understanding by requiring students to distinguish what a concept is and what it isn't.

The Frayer Model includes a four-square chart that provides academic vocabulary knowledge, while clarifying, determining, and analysing difficult vocabulary, word structure and meaning. The central oval has the chosen word written on it. In some cases, parts of speech can also be written in the central oval.

‍

‍

The Frayer Model is a graphic organiser used to help students learn new academic terms. It includes four squares that represent a word's characteristics, definition, examples, and non-examples. This tool allows learners to gain better understanding of difficult words through clarification and analysis.

The model works by having the chosen word written in the centre of an oval. Within each of the four squares surrounding it, associated concepts can be written down. The first square is for characteristics; this includes defining attributes such as sizes, shapes, and functions.

The second box is for the definition; this is usually expressed in one sentence and should cover the general meaning of the word or term being studied. The third box holds an example provided to give context around what can be expected from the given concept or term being assessed.

In the fourth box there's a listing of related non-examples; here you write down items that are related but don't fit into the current definition as presented by either characteristics or examples found in other squares, ruling them out altogether.

 

‍

Dual coding theory, proposed by Allan Paivio (1971) and applied to education by Oliver Caviglioli (2019), shows that combining verbal and visual information strengthens memory encoding.

‍

How to Implement Frayer Model Effectively

Teachers implement the Frayer Model by first modelling how to complete each quadrant with familiar vocabulary, then guiding students through practise examples. They can use paper templates or digital tools, adapting the complexity based on student age and subject matter. The model works best when introduced gradually, starting with whole-class instruction before moving to small group or independent work.

1. Introducing new concepts: When presenting a new concept or topic, teachers can use the Frayer Model to help students understand and define key terms, as well as identify their characteristics, examples, and non-examples.
2. Differentiating instruction: Teachers can differentiate instruction by customising the Frayer Model according to students' needs, prior knowledge, or proficiency levels, allowing for more individualised learning experiences.
3. Reinforcing prior knowledge: The Frayer Model can be used as a review tool to reinforce students' understanding of previously taught concepts, enabling them to connect new information with existing knowledge.
4. Encouraging peer collaboration: Teachers can have students work in pairs or small groups to complete a Frayer Model, encouraging collaboration, discussion, and deeper understanding of the subject matter.
5. Supporting visual learners: The Frayer Model's graphic organiser format helps visual learners better comprehend and retain information by organising it in a visually appealing and structured manner.
6. Enhancing criticalthinking: By requiring students to analyse concepts, their attributes, and their r elationship to other ideas, the Frayer Model promotes critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
7. Facilitating self-assessment: Students can use the Frayer Model to monitor their own understanding of concepts and vocabulary, identifying areas where they may need additional support or clarification.
8. Building cross-curricular connections: Teachers can use the Frayer Model to highlight the interconnectedness of concepts across different subjects, illustrating how vocabulary and ideas relate to one another in various disciplines.
9. Preparing for assessments: Teachers can incorporate the Frayer Model into test preparation activities, helping students review and solidify their understanding of key concepts and vocabulary before exams.
10. Encouraging independent study: By providing students with a structured method for exploring and analysing new concepts, the Frayer Model supports independent study and self-directed learning.

By integrating the Frayer Model into instructional strategies, teachers can enhance students' comprehension of subject-specific vocabulary, deepen their understanding of concepts, and promote critical thinking and collaboration within the classroom.

‍

Building student vocabulary with the Frayer model">

‍

‍

Why Frayer Model Templates Work

The Frayer Model template is effective because it moves students beyond rote memorization to actively construct meaning through multiple perspectives. By requiring both examples and non-examples, students must think critically about word boundaries and relationships. This structured approach helps students retain vocabulary longer and apply it more accurately in context.

• Teachers need to analyse the concept or keyword they wish to introduce. They'll create a list of features vital to the explanation of the tricky vocabulary;
• Teachers present the concept to students and allow pupils to give examples (photographs or pictures work well for younger children);
• Create a list of all the strong vocabulary that students mentioned on the board. At this stage, it's advisable not to write anything in the diagram yet. Students must be encouraged to contribute to the list or debate examples;
• The teacher asks students what's common among all the examples. Their responses are written on a new list on the board (but the model remains empty at this step);

‍



The students read the list and then write more examples to the first list and highlight those that aren't present in their reading;

• Students do the same with the second list; they write more features and highlight those not present in their reading.
• The teacher introduces the Frayer Model to pupils and writes the examples in suitable sections (Non-examples and Examples). Students may need to carry out further research to find out if some examples are correct or incorrect.
• The teacher discusses each feature of the second list with students. If a feature is found in all examples, it goes in Essential Characteristics. Features found in only some examples go in Nonessential Characteristics (e.g., a particular size, colour, or gender). Students may carry out further research to determine if certain characteristics are nonessential or essential, either individually or with classmates.
• Students use the information in the model to write a passage (either individually or with partners) describing the provided concept. After writing, they may share details with classmates to discuss the concept. After exchanging ideas, students may write a new passage.

‍



 

‍

‍

Frayer Model Examples Across Content Areas

In science, students might use the Frayer Model to understand 'photosynthesis' by defining it, listing characteristics like 'requires sunlight,' providing examples like 'plants making food,' and non-examples like 'animals eating food.' In math, the model helps distinguish concepts like 'prime numbers' by showing examples (2, 3, 5) and non-examples (4, 6, 8). Social studies teachers use it for complex terms like 'democracy' by comparing characteristics and providing historical examples and counterexamples.

While studying a unit, students may need to learn each vocabulary term in a list. Out of this strong vocabulary list, only a few words represent the key terms. For instance, students studying a science unit about rocks might encounter the vocabulary shown below.



 

Even if primary school students learn vocabulary independently from a vocabulary wall, they need to know the relationships between complex concepts and build a deeper understanding of major academic concepts. In the entire vocabulary list, three content terms create the foundation for the whole unit: metamorphic rocks, sedimentary rocks, and igneous rocks. As these phrases are primary to understanding the content, instructors may need to spend extra time ensuring pupils understand them.

In this case, it's helpful to use student-friendly definitions along with a graphic organiser like the Frayer Model. When teachers use instructional methods involving the Frayer Model appropriately, they can incorporate elements of vocabulary teaching including word selection, clearly contextualising and defining vocabulary terms, helping pupils actively participate in word processing, and offering understanding through multiple exposures to phrases.



‍

‍

Best Subjects for Frayer Model Implementation

Educational experts champion the Frayer Model as a versatile and effective vocabulary instruction tool, promoting vocabulary development and accelerating student learningacross all grade levels and subjects. The model's adaptable approach proves particularly beneficial in elementary classrooms, where pupils are introduced to key concepts and unique vocabulary intrinsic to each discipline.

The Frayer Model consists of four cells, each with a designated title, forming a cohesive layout that encourages learners to go beyond simple vocabulary memorisation. This model functions as a powerful learning tool and graphic organiser, facilitating vocabulary development while simultaneously enabling brainstorming of original ideas and essential characteristics connected to specific topics.

Students using the Frayer Model benefit from a focused brainstorming strategy, particularly beneficial for those who require greater concentration or are prone to distraction. This approach helps students navigate difficult vocabulary and retain information more effectively throughout the learning process.

When implemented before starting a project, the Frayer Model allows students to brainstorm ideas that will bolster their research. Alternatively, it can be used after project completion to consolidate information gathered during the learning process.

The benefits of the Frayer Model extend beyond vocabulary development, serving as an all-encompassing instructional tool that encourages deeper understanding of subject-specific terminology. Its effectiveness in propelling student learning makes the Frayer Model an indispensable resource for teachers, enhancing the educational experience across a wide array of disciplines.



‍

‍

Adapting Frayer Model for Modern Classrooms

Modern teachers can adapt the Frayer Model using digital tools like Google Drawings, Jamboard, or specialised vocabulary apps that allow collaborative completion and easy sharing. The model can be enhanced with multimedia elements such as images, audio pronunciations, or video examples to support diverse learners. Teachers can also create digital Frayer Model galleries where students can access and review peer work for deeper understanding.

The Frayer Model remains a powerful, free vocabulary development strategy with new digital applications.

‍

‍

Cost

Free, The Frayer Model is a teaching methodology requiring only paper or digital templates.

‍

‍

Digital Frayer Model Tools

• Create templates in Google Slides or Canva
• Use interactive whiteboards for whole-class modelling
• AI tools can generate example Frayer Models quickly
• Digital collaboration using shared documents

‍

‍

Related Vocabulary Strategies

• Knowledge Organisers
• Dual Coding
• Mind Maps

‍

‍

What Research Supports the Frayer Model for Vocabulary Learning?

The original 1969 research by Dorothy Frayer and colleagues at the Wisconsin Centre for Education Research established the model's effectiveness for concept development and vocabulary acquisition. Subsequent studies have shown that graphic organisers like the Frayer Model improve vocabulary retention by 20-40% compared to traditional definition-only methods. Research consistently demonstrates that the model's multi-faceted approach helps students, especially visual learners and English language learners, develop deeper word knowledge.

These foundational studies have shaped our understanding of how the Frayer Model and similar strategies support vocabulary acquisition. Each offers evidence that teachers can apply directly to classroom practise.

1. Supporting Vocabulary Acquisition in Physical Education Settings (Wickens & Parker, 2019)
   This paper discusses the Frayer Model as a vocabulary strategy that reinforces conceptual understanding in physical education. The researchers found that structured vocabulary instruction using graphic organisers improved students' ability to articulate movement concepts and apply terminology correctly during activities.
2. Model Frayer untuk Penguasaan Kosakata Siswa Sekolah Dasar (Sayekti, 2015)
   This research emphasises the Frayer Model as a powerful tool for understanding abstract and academic concepts. The study found particular effectiveness for visual learners through the four-square model, with students demonstrating improved retention and application of new vocabulary compared to traditional methods.
3. Improving Literacy in Secondary School Geography (Rampersad, Ali & Ali, 2020)
   This study demonstrates how the Frayer Model improved students' reading comprehension and vocabulary use in secondary school geography. Teachers found that students who used the model showed stronger performance on assessments requiring geographical terminology and concept application.
4. A Comparison between the Frayer Model of Concept Attainment and the Textbook Approach (Peters, 1974)
   This foundational paper compares the Frayer Model with traditional textbook approaches, showing its superiority in facilitating conceptual understanding and improving organisational patterns of written material. Students using the Frayer Model demonstrated better transfer of learning to new contexts.
5. Theory-Based Instructional Models Applied in Classroom Contexts (Pham, 2011)
   This research highlights the Frayer Model's effectiveness in supporting self-directed learning, collaborative learning, and critical thinking. The study found that students who regularly used the model developed stronger

‍

‍

Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly is the Frayer Model and how does it differ from traditional vocabulary teaching methods?

The Frayer Model is a four-square graphic organiser with a target word in the centre, surrounded by sections for definition, characteristics, examples, and non-examples. Unlike traditional methods that rely on rote memorisation and dictionary definitions, it encourages students to think critically about word meanings and relationships by exploring vocabulary from multiple angles.

‍

‍

How should teachers introduce the Frayer Model to students who haven't used it before?

Teachers should begin by modelling how to complete each quadrant using familiar vocabulary, then guide students through practise examples with whole-class instruction. The complexity should be adapted based on student age and subject matter, gradually moving from teacher-led demonstrations to small group work and finally independent practise.

‍

‍

What are the main benefits of using the Frayer Model over other vocabulary strategies?

The Frayer Model promotes deep understanding by requiring students to distinguish what a concept is and what it isn't, moving beyond surface-level memorisation. It particularly benefits visual learners through its structured graphic format and enhances critical thinking by encouraging students to analyse concepts and their relationships to other ideas.

‍

‍

Can the Frayer Model be used across different subjects, and if so, how?

Yes, whilst originally developed for social studies education, the Frayer Model is now widely applied across all subjects including mathematics, science, and English. Teachers can adapt the model to explore subject-specific vocabulary such as 'photosynthesis' in science or 'metaphor' in English literature, maintaining the same four-quadrant structure whilst adjusting content complexity.

‍

‍

What practical challenges might teachers face when implementing the Frayer Model, and how can these be addressed?

Teachers may initially find students struggle with identifying non-examples or distinguishing between characteristics and definitions. These challenges can be addressed through scaffolding, providing guided practise, and starting with concrete, familiar concepts before progressing to more abstract vocabulary terms.

‍

‍

How can the Frayer Model be adapted for different age groups and ability levels?

Teachers can differentiate the Frayer Model by customising it according to students' needs, prior knowledge, and proficiency levels. For younger students, simpler vocabulary and visual aids can be used, whilst older students can tackle more complex academic terms and provide more detailed analysis in each quadrant.

‍

‍

What digital tools or resources are available for creating Frayer Model activities?

Teachers can use both paper templates and digital tools to implement the Frayer Model, though the article mentions these are available as free resources. The model can be created using basic graphic organisers or more sophisticated digital platforms, allowing for flexibility in classroom implementation and student accessibility.

​

Free Resource Pack

Download this free Formative Assessment, Feedback & AFT Strategies resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.

Free Resource Pack
Formative Assessment & Feedback Strategies
3 essential resources for teachers to enhance assessment for learning and feedback practices.


Formative AssessmentFeedbackAssessment for LearningCPD Briefing VisualTeacher ChecklistClassroom Strategies
Download Now ▼
Download your free bundle
Fill in your details below and we'll send the resource pack straight to your inbox.
First name
Last name
School email
School name
Your roleSelect your roleClass TeacherSENCoSubject LeadPhase LeadDeputy HeadHeadteacherTeaching AssistantOther
Current school focusSelect focus areametacognition">Metacognition and self-regulationLiteracy and readingNumeracy and mathsBehaviour and wellbeingSEND and inclusionAssessment and feedbackCurriculum developmentStaff CPD and trainingOther / not applicable
Quick survey (helps us create better resources)
How confident are you in designing and implementing effective formative assessment and feedback strategies in your teaching?
Not Confident
Slightly Confident
Moderately Confident
Confident
Very Confident
To what extent does your school foster a culture of effective formative assessment and feedback among staff?
Not at all
Slightly
Moderately
Significantly
Extensively
How consistently do you integrate Assessment for Teaching (AFT) strategies into your daily classroom practice?
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Always
Download Free Resource Pack
Your resource pack is ready
We've also sent a copy to your email. Check your inbox.
Download Resources
Free resource from structural-learning.com · Evidence-based teaching tools

​

​

Frayer Model and Tier 2 Vocabulary

Beck, McKeown and Kucan (2002) categorised vocabulary into three tiers. Tier 1 words are everyday language pupils already know. Tier 3 words are domain-specific technical terms. Tier 2 words sit between: academic vocabulary used across subjects (analyse, evaluate, compare, significant). These are the words that most affect reading comprehension and academic writing.

The Frayer Model is particularly effective for Tier 2 vocabulary because it forces pupils to move beyond simple definitions. When a Year 5 class encounters "significant," completing the four quadrants requires them to distinguish it from "important" (non-example), identify where it appears across subjects (examples), and articulate what makes something significant rather than merely noticeable (characteristics). This depth of processing strengthens working memory encoding far more effectively than copying definitions from a glossary.

​

Cross-Subject Applications

In mathematics, the Frayer Model works well for concepts pupils routinely confuse. A Year 4 class studying "fraction" would list characteristics (part of a whole, numerator and denominator, can represent division), examples (1/2, 3/4, 0.5), non-examples (ratios, percentages used differently), and a definition in their own words. In science, "adaptation" can be distinguished from "evolution" through the non-examples quadrant. In history, "democracy" benefits from concrete examples (Ancient Athens, UK Parliament) alongside non-examples (dictatorship, absolute monarchy). This cross-subject versatility makes the Frayer Model one of the most transferable graphic organisers in a teacher's toolkit.

‍

‍

Further Reading: Key Research Papers

These peer-reviewed studies provide deeper insights into the frayer model: building vocabulary understanding and its application in educational settings.

Using Systematic Instruction and Graphic Organizers to Teach Science Concepts to Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability 117 citations

Knight et al. (2013)

This research examines how systematic instruction combined with graphic organisers can effectively teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disabilities. The study is highly relevant for teachers using the Frayer Model because it demonstrates how visual organisers can be particularly powerful tools for students with diverse learning needs, providing evidence that structured vocabulary frameworks benefit all learners.

THE ROLE OF VISUAL LEARNING AIDS ACROSS DIVERSE LEARNING STYLES IN HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION 13 citations

Qasserras et al. (2024)

This study investigates how visual learning aids impact high school students with different learning styles, drawing on cognitive loadtheory and dual coding principles. Teachers implementing the Frayer Model will find th is research valuable because it provides theoretical backing for why visual vocabulary organisers work effectively across diverse student populations and learning preferences.

Vocabulary Acquisition in EFL: A Literature Review of effective Vocabulary Teaching Strategies 11 citations

Sutrisna et al. (2021)

This literature review analyses effective strategies for teaching vocabulary to English as Foreign Language students, emphasising the importance of selecting effective instructional approaches. The research directly supports teachers using the Frayer Model by providing broader context on evidence-based vocabulary instruction methods and highlighting why structured approaches to vocabulary development are essential for student success.

ENHANCING VOCABULARY LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY LANGUAGE EDUCATION: EXPLORING EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES AND INTERACTIVE APPROACHES 4 citations

Handig et al. (2023)

This study explores effective vocabulary teaching strategies and interactive approaches used by elementary language teachers through interviews with experienced educators. Teachers interested in the Frayer Model will benefit from this research as it examines real classroom practices for vocabulary instruction and provides insights into how interactive, structured approaches enhance elementary students vocabulary development.

This comprehensive literature review on comprehension instruction trends 1 citations (Author, Year) examines current approaches and methodologies used to teach reading comprehension skills to elementary school students, analysing patterns in instructional practices and their effectiveness across different educational contexts.

Parlindungan et al. (2022)

This literature review examines various instructional approaches for improving reading comprehension in elementary students, building on findings from the National Reading Panel report. The research connects to the Frayer Model by demonstrating how vocabulary instruction is fundamental to comprehension development and providing evidence for structured approaches to building student understanding of academic language.